Surgical Outcomes, Technical Performance, and Surgery Burden of Robotic Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Study. Issue 5 (22nd November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Surgical Outcomes, Technical Performance, and Surgery Burden of Robotic Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Study. Issue 5 (22nd November 2022)
- Main Title:
- Surgical Outcomes, Technical Performance, and Surgery Burden of Robotic Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
- Authors:
- Chen, Qi-Yue
Zhong, Qing
Liu, Zhi-Yu
Li, Ping
Wang, Jia-Bin
Lin, Jian-Xian
Lu, Jun
Cao, Long-Long
Lin, Mi
Tu, Ru-Hong
Huang, Ze-Ning
Lin, Ju-Li
Zheng, Hua-Long
Lin, Guang-Tan
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Huang, Chang-Ming
Xie, Jian-Wei - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To compare the short-term outcomes, surgery burden, and technical performance of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer (GC). Summary of Background Data: The impact of robotic systems on total gastrectomy remains obscure. Methods: This prospective study included 50 patients with advanced proximal GC underwent RTG combined with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy between March 2018 and February 2020. Patients who underwent LTG in the FUGES-002, http://links.lww.com/SLA/C929 study were enrolled to compare the outcomes between RTG and LTG. Results: After propensity score matching, 48 patients in the RTG group and 96 patients in the LTG group were included in the analysis. The RTG group had a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss than the LTG group (38.7 vs 66.4 mL, P = 0.042). Significantly more extraperigastric lymph nodes were retrieved in the RTG group than in the LTG group (20.2 vs 17.5, P = 0.039). The average number of errors was lower in the RTG group than in the LTG group (43.2 vs 53.8 times/case, P < 0.001). The RTG group had a higher technical skill score (30.2 vs 28.4, P < 0.001) and a lower surgery task load index (33.2 vs 39.8, P < 0.001) than the LTG group. No significant difference was found in terms of postoperative morbidity between the 2 groups (14.6% vs 16.7%, P = 0.748). Conclusions: In complex total gastrectomy for GC, compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery,Abstract : Objective: To compare the short-term outcomes, surgery burden, and technical performance of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer (GC). Summary of Background Data: The impact of robotic systems on total gastrectomy remains obscure. Methods: This prospective study included 50 patients with advanced proximal GC underwent RTG combined with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy between March 2018 and February 2020. Patients who underwent LTG in the FUGES-002, http://links.lww.com/SLA/C929 study were enrolled to compare the outcomes between RTG and LTG. Results: After propensity score matching, 48 patients in the RTG group and 96 patients in the LTG group were included in the analysis. The RTG group had a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss than the LTG group (38.7 vs 66.4 mL, P = 0.042). Significantly more extraperigastric lymph nodes were retrieved in the RTG group than in the LTG group (20.2 vs 17.5, P = 0.039). The average number of errors was lower in the RTG group than in the LTG group (43.2 vs 53.8 times/case, P < 0.001). The RTG group had a higher technical skill score (30.2 vs 28.4, P < 0.001) and a lower surgery task load index (33.2 vs 39.8, P < 0.001) than the LTG group. No significant difference was found in terms of postoperative morbidity between the 2 groups (14.6% vs 16.7%, P = 0.748). Conclusions: In complex total gastrectomy for GC, compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery provides a technically superior operative environment and reduces surgeon workload at high-volume specialized institutions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of surgery. Volume 276:Issue 5(2022)
- Journal:
- Annals of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 276:Issue 5(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 276, Issue 5 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 276
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0276-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- e434
- Page End:
- e443
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-22
- Subjects:
- gastric cancer -- laparoscopic total gastrectomy -- robotic total gastrectomy -- surgery burden -- surgical outcomes -- technical performance
Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.annalsofsurgery.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004764 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4932
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1044.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24027.xml