Association between the reflection magnitude and blood pressure in a multiethnic cohort: the Healthy Life in an Urban Setting study. Issue 11 (8th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bouwmeester, Thomas A.; van de Velde, Lennart; Galenkamp, Henrike; Postema, Pieter G.; Westerhof, Berend E.; van den Born, Bert-Jan H.; Collard, Didier
• Is Part Of: Journal of hypertension. Volume 40:Issue 11(2022)
• Page Start: 2263
• Page End: 2270
• Publication Date: 2022-11-08
• Subjects: blood pressure -- Healthy Life in an Urban Setting -- hypertension -- pulse wave analysis -- reflection magnitude; Hypertension -- Periodicals; Hypertension -- Periodicals; 616.132005
• DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003256
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1473-5598

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: Reflection magnitude (RM), the ratio of the amplitudes of the backward and forward central arterial pressure waves, has been shown to predict cardiovascular events. However, the association with blood pressure (BP) and hypertension is unclear. Methods: We assessed RM in 10 195 individuals of Dutch, South-Asian Surinamese, African Surinamese, Ghanaian, Turkish and Moroccan origin aged between 18 and 70 years (54.2% female) participating in the Healthy Life in an Urban Setting study. To determine RM, central arterial pressure and flow were reconstructed from finger BP. Hypertension was defined based on office-BP and medication. Associations with BP, hypertension, and hypertensive organ damage were assessed using linear regression models with correction for relevant covariates. Results: Mean RM was 62.5% (standard deviation [SD] 8.0) in men and 63.8% (SD 8.1) in women. RM was lowest in Dutch and highest in South-Asian and African participants. RM increased linearly with 1.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23–1.46) for every 10 mmHg increase in systolic BP from 120 mmHg onwards, while the relation with diastolic BP was nonlinear. RM was 2.40 (95% CI 2.04–2.76) higher in hypertensive men and 3.82 (95% CI 3.46–4.19) higher in hypertensive women compared to normotensive men and women. In hypertensive men and women with ECG-based left ventricular hypertrophy or albuminuria RM was 1.64 (95% CI 1.09–2.20) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.37–1.52) higher compared to hypertensive participants without hypertensive organ damage. Conclusion: RM is associated with BP, hypertension and hypertensive organ damage, and may in part explain disparities in hypertension associated cardiovascular risk.