Non-adherence to COVID-19 lockdown: who are they? A cross-sectional study in Portugal. (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Noronha, N.; Moniz, M.; Gama, A.; Laires, P.A.; Goes, A.R.; Pedro, A.R.; Dias, S.; Soares, P.; Nunes, C.
• Is Part Of: Public health. Volume 211(2022)
• Page Start: 5
• Page End: 13
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: COVID-19 -- Lockdown -- Adherence -- Prevention -- Non-pharmacological interventions; Public health -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 362.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.07.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0033-3506

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The SARS-CoV-2 virus has spread worldwide, leading governments to implement mitigation measures. Understanding the reluctance to adhere to non-pharmacological interventions might help promote adherence to these measures. This study aimed to identify factors associated with non-adherence to the first lockdown in Portugal. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: This study used data from a Portuguese community-based survey entitled 'COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion'. Data were collected on risk perception, health status and social experiences using a snowball sampling technique. The event of interest corresponded to participants who reported not staying home during the lockdown period, serving as a proxy for non-adherence to lockdown. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with non-adherence to the first lockdown. Results: Responses from 133, 601 individual questionnaires that were completed during the first week of the first lockdown in 2020 were analysed. A minority of participants (5.6%) reported non-adherence to lockdown (i.e. leaving home for reasons other than essential situations). Working in the workplace was the factor with the strongest association of non-adherence to the lockdown. Several other factors were also associated with non-adherence to the first lockdown; namely, being a man, being a student, having a low level of education, having a low income, living alone or with a high-infection-risk professional (e.g. doctor, nurse, pharmaceutical, health technician, firefighter, police officer, military, essential services worker), perceiving the risk of getting COVID-19 to be high, not having social support in case of infection, feeling agitated, sad or anxious every day, and considering the preventive measures to be unimportant or inadequate. Conclusions: Non-adherence to lockdown was associated with socio-economic, trust and perception factors. Future research should investigate the mechanisms underlying these associations to help identify the population groups who are most at risk of non-adherence.