Improving quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of hospital-based quality improvement interventions. Issue 10 (11th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brima, Nataliya; Morhason-Bello, Imran O; Charles, Vandy; Davies, Justine; Leather, Andy JM
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 12:Issue 10(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-10-11
• Subjects: Organisational development -- Quality in health care -- SURGERY; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062616
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To systematically review existing literature on hospital-based quality improvement studies in sub-Saharan Africa that aim to improve surgical and anaesthesia care, capturing clinical, process and implementation outcomes in order to evaluate the impact of the intervention and implementation learning. Design: We conducted a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. Setting: Literature on hospital-based quality improvement studies in sub-Saharan Africa reviewed until 31 December 2021. Participants: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, CINAHL, Web of Science databases and grey literature were searched. Intervention: We extracted data on intervention characteristics and how the intervention was delivered and evaluated. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Importantly, we assessed whether clinical, process and implementation outcomes were collected and separately categorised the outcomes under the Institute of Medicine quality domains. Risk of bias was not assessed. Results: Of 1573 articles identified, 49 were included from 17/48 sub-Saharan African countries, 16 of which were low-income or lower middle-income countries. Almost two-thirds of the studies took place in East Africa (31/49, 63.2%). The most common intervention focus was reduction of surgical site infection (12/49, 24.5%) and use of a surgical safety checklist (14/49, 28.6%). Use of implementation and quality improvement science methods were rare. Over half the studies measured clinical outcomes (29/49, 59.2%), with the most commonly reported ones being perioperative mortality (13/29, 44.8%) and surgical site infection rate (14/29, 48.3%). Process and implementation outcomes were reported in over two thirds of the studies (34/49, 69.4% and 35, 71.4%, respectively). The most studied quality domain was safety (44/49, 89.8%), with efficiency (4/49, 8.2%) and equitability (2/49, 4.1%) the least studied domains. Conclusions: There are few hospital-based studies that focus on improving the quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa. Use of implementation and quality improvement methodologies remain low, and some quality domains are neglected. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019125570