Systematic review of copper intrauterine contraception continuation in young nulliparous women based on intrauterine device type. Issue 10 (3rd October 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Systematic review of copper intrauterine contraception continuation in young nulliparous women based on intrauterine device type. Issue 10 (3rd October 2022)
- Main Title:
- Systematic review of copper intrauterine contraception continuation in young nulliparous women based on intrauterine device type
- Authors:
- Akintomide, Hannat
James, Alison
Moffat, Malcolm
Barnes, Pam
Rankin, Judith - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: No copper intrauterine device (IUD) type is known to better suit young nulliparous women who tend to experience higher rates of IUD discontinuation compared with their older parous counterparts. A systematic review to determine which IUDs have higher continuation rates in young nulliparous women was undertaken. Design: Systematic review and meta-analyses of available evidence based on IUD type. Data sources: AMED, BNI, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, EMCARE, HMIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, TRIP, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception to 11 May 2022; as well as the Bandolier, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Department of Health, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines, WHO and Google Scholar websites. Eligibility criteria: All studies on IUDs currently available in the UK or comparable (same design and size) to those available in the UK, involving nulliparous women of any age including those aged under 30. Data extraction and synthesis: Independently extracted data were assessed as low risk of bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Random effects meta-analyses of proportions were performed where data, including subgroups, were amenable to quantitative synthesis. Heterogeneity was reported using tau 2 and I 2 statistics, and sensitivity analyses were alsoAbstract : Objectives: No copper intrauterine device (IUD) type is known to better suit young nulliparous women who tend to experience higher rates of IUD discontinuation compared with their older parous counterparts. A systematic review to determine which IUDs have higher continuation rates in young nulliparous women was undertaken. Design: Systematic review and meta-analyses of available evidence based on IUD type. Data sources: AMED, BNI, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, EMCARE, HMIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, TRIP, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception to 11 May 2022; as well as the Bandolier, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Department of Health, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines, WHO and Google Scholar websites. Eligibility criteria: All studies on IUDs currently available in the UK or comparable (same design and size) to those available in the UK, involving nulliparous women of any age including those aged under 30. Data extraction and synthesis: Independently extracted data were assessed as low risk of bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Random effects meta-analyses of proportions were performed where data, including subgroups, were amenable to quantitative synthesis. Heterogeneity was reported using tau 2 and I 2 statistics, and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: Nineteen studies involving 13 045 nulliparous women were included but the heterogeneity of participant ages, parity and IUD types made quantitative synthesis of outcome data in totality inappropriate. The highest continuation rate obtained was 91.02% (95% CI 88.01% to 93.64%) for the smaller TCu 380A at 12 months post insertion. Conclusions: Evidence for IUD use in young nulliparous women based on IUD type remains limited. Smaller sized IUD types appear better suited to this group of IUD users, however, more research is needed. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019120969. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 12:Issue 10(2022)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 12:Issue 10(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 12, Issue 10 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0012-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-10-03
- Subjects:
- reproductive medicine -- community gynaecology -- public health
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060606 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24012.xml