Increased blood pressure variability during general anaesthesia is associated with worse outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective observational cohort study. Issue 10 (5th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xu, Chao; Jin, Tianyu; Chen, Zhicai; Zhang, Zheyu; Zhang, Kemeng; Mao, Hui; Ye, Sasa; Geng, Yu; Shi, Zongjie
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 12:Issue 10(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-10-05
• Subjects: stroke -- neurosurgery -- adult neurology; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059108
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Optimal periprocedural blood pressure (BP) management during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischaemic stroke is still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between intraprocedural BP variability (BPV) and outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) following MT with general anaesthesia. Design: A prospective observational cohort study. Setting: This study was conducted in a single tertiary hospital of Hangzhou in Zhejiang province. Participants: A total of 141 patients with LVO treated with MT were finally included between January 2018 and September 2020. Main outcome measures: Intraprocedural BP was recorded every 5 min throughout the procedure. BPV was measured as SD, coefficient of variation (CV), max-min (RANGE) and successive variation. Haemorrhagic transformation was assessed on 24-hour CT images according to European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III trial. Poor functional outcome was defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 3–6. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association of BPV parameters with the incidence of parenchymal haemorrhage (PH) and poor functional outcome. Results: After controlling for age, female, history of smoking, hypertension and atrial fibrillation, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, baseline systolic BP (SBP), baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, bridging thrombolysis and times of retrieval attempts, the results demonstrated that intraprocedural SBPRANGE (OR 1.029; 95% CI 1.003 to 1.055; p=0.027), SBPSD (OR 1.135; 95% CI 1.023 to 1.259; p=0.017) and SBPCV (OR 1.189; 95% CI 1.053 to 1.342; p=0.005) were independently associated with poor functional outcome. However, the independent association between intraprocedural BPV and PH at 24 hours has not been established in this study. Conclusions: Increased intraprocedural BPV was more likely to have poor functional outcome in patients with LVO following MT with general anaesthesia. This finding indicates that special precautions should be taken to minimise BP fluctuation during procedure.