Past, present and future of living systematic review: a bibliometrics analysis. Issue 10 (11th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zheng, Qingyong; Xu, Jianguo; Gao, Ya; Liu, Ming; Cheng, Luying; Xiong, Lu; Cheng, Jie; Yuan, Mengyuan; OuYang, Guoyuan; Huang, Hengyi; Wu, Jiarui; Zhang, Junhua; Tian, Jinhui
• Is Part Of: BMJ global health. Volume 7:Issue 10(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-10-11
• Subjects: review -- systematic review -- health systems; World health -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009378
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2059-7908

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: In recent years, the concept of living systematic review (LSR) has attracted the attention of many scholars and institutions. A growing number of studies have been conducted based on LSR methodology, but their focus direction is unclear. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of existing LSR-related studies and to analyse their whole picture and future trends with bibliometrics. Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was used to construct a representative dataset of LSRs up to October 2021. GraphPad V.8.2.1 and Mindmaster Pro presented the basic information of the included studies and the timeline of LSR development, respectively. The author and country cooperation network, hotspot distribution clustering, historical citation network and future development trend prediction related to LSR were visualised by VOSviewer V.1.6.16 and R-Studio V.1.4. Results: A total of 213 studies were eventually included. The concept of LSR was first proposed in 2014, and the number of studies has proliferated since 2020. There was a closer collaboration between author teams and more frequent LSR research development and collaboration in Europe, North America and Australia. Numerous LSR studies have been published in high-impact journals. COVID-19 is the predominant disease of concern at this stage, and the rehabilitation of its patients and virological studies are possible directions of research in LSR for a long time to come. A review of existing studies found that more than half of the LSR series had not yet been updated and that the method needed to be more standardised in practice. Conclusion: Although LSR has a relatively short history, it has received much attention and currently has a high overall acceptance. The LSR methodology was further practised in COVID-19, and we look forward to seeing it applied in more areas.