An integrated path for spatial capture–recapture and animal movement modeling. Issue 10 (30th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McClintock, Brett T.; Abrahms, Briana; Chandler, Richard B.; Conn, Paul B.; Converse, Sarah J.; Emmet, Robert L.; Gardner, Beth; Hostetter, Nathan J.; Johnson, Devin S.
• Is Part Of: Ecology. Volume 103:Issue 10(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-09-30
• Subjects: animal movement -- density and distribution -- integrated population model -- mark–recapture -- movement ecology -- population dynamics -- population ecology -- spatial capture–recapture; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Écologie -- Périodiques; Ecologie; Écologie; Écologie animale; Écologie végétale; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3473
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-9658

Abstract

Abstract: Ecologists and conservation biologists increasingly rely on spatial capture–recapture (SCR) and movement modeling to study animal populations. Historically, SCR has focused on population‐level processes (e.g., vital rates, abundance, density, and distribution), whereas animal movement modeling has focused on the behavior of individuals (e.g., activity budgets, resource selection, migration). Even though animal movement is clearly a driver of population‐level patterns and dynamics, technical and conceptual developments to date have not forged a firm link between the two fields. Instead, movement modeling has typically focused on the individual level without providing a coherent scaling from individual‐ to population‐level processes, whereas SCR has typically focused on the population level while greatly simplifying the movement processes that give rise to the observations underlying these models. In our view, the integration of SCR and animal movement modeling has tremendous potential for allowing ecologists to scale up from individuals to populations and advancing the types of inferences that can be made at the intersection of population, movement, and landscape ecology. Properly accounting for complex animal movement processes can also potentially reduce bias in estimators of population‐level parameters, thereby improving inferences that are critical for species conservation and management. This introductory article to the Special Feature reviews recent advances in SCR and animal movement modeling, establishes a common notation, highlights potential advantages of linking individual‐level (Lagrangian) movements to population‐level (Eulerian) processes, and outlines a general conceptual framework for the integration of movement and SCR models. We then identify important avenues for future research, including key challenges and potential pitfalls in the developments and applications that lie ahead.