Reported clinical incidents of children with intellectual disability: A qualitative analysis. (16th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ong, Natalie; Mimmo, Laurel; Barnett, Diana; Long, Janet; Weise, Janelle; Walton, Merrilyn
• Is Part Of: Developmental medicine & child neurology. Volume 64:Number 11(2022)
• Page Start: 1359
• Page End: 1365
• Publication Date: 2022-05-16
• Subjects: Child development -- Periodicals; Pediatric neurology -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15262
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-1622

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To qualitatively explore reported clinical incidents of children with intellectual disability aged 0 to 18 years. Method: A secondary qualitative evaluation using latent content analysis was used on retrospective hospital incident management reporting data (1st January–31st December 2017) on 1367 admissions for 1018 randomly selected patients admitted to two tertiary children's hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Sex and age at admission in children with and without intellectual disability: 83 (43.7%) versus 507 (43.1%) females and 107 (56.3%) versus 670 (56.9%) males, p =0.875; median age 3 years (0–18y) versus 4 years (0–18y), p =0.122. Of these, 44 patient safety incident reports for children with intellectual disability (sex, SD, and range) and 167 incident reports for children without intellectual disability (sex, SD, and range) were found and analysed. Results: Ten themes were synthesized from the data and represented the groups with and without intellectual disability. Children with intellectual disability had a significantly higher proportion of care issues identified by their parents. They also had higher rates of multiple reported clinical incidents per admission compared to children without intellectual disability. Interpretation: Mechanisms to advocate and raise patient safety issues for children with intellectual disability are needed. Partnerships with parents and training of staff in reporting clinical incidents for this population would enhance the embedding of reasonable adaptations into incident management systems for ongoing monitoring and improvement. What this paper adds: Children with intellectual disability experienced multiple patient safety incidents per admission compared to children without intellectual disability. Children with intellectual disability had significantly increased rates of parent‐identified incidents. Issues with medication, communication, delays in diagnosis and treatment, and identification of deterioration were noted. What this paper adds: Children with intellectual disability experienced multiple patient safety incidents per admission compared to children without intellectual disability. Children with intellectual disability had significantly increased rates of parent‐identified incidents. Issues with medication, communication, delays in diagnosis and treatment, and identification of deterioration were noted.