Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance benfluralin. (29th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alvarez, Fernando; Arena, Maria; Auteri, Domenica; Binaglia, Marco; Castoldi, Anna Federica; Chiusolo, Arianna; Colagiorgi, Angelo; Colas, Mathilde; Crivellente, Federica; De Lentdecker, Chloe; Egsmose, Mark; Fait, Gabriella; Ferilli, Franco; Gouliarmou, Varvara; Herrero Nogareda, Laia; Ippolito, Alessio; Istace, Frederique; Jarrah, Samira; Kardassi, Dimitra; Kienzler, Aude; Lanzoni, Anna; Lava, Roberto; Leuschner, Renata; Linguadoca, Alberto; Lythgo, Christopher; Magrans, Oriol; Mangas, Iris; Miron, Ileana; Molnar, Tunde; Padovani, Laura; Parra Morte, Juan Manuel; Rizzuto, Simone; Serafimova, Rositsa; Sharp, Rachel; Szentes, Csaba; Terron, Andrea; Theobald, Anne; Tiramani, Manuela; Villamar‐Bouza, Laura;
• Is Part Of: EFSA journal. Volume 20:Number 9(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-09-29
• Subjects: benfluralin -- peer review -- risk assessment -- pesticide -- herbicide; Food -- Europe -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Food Safety; Food -- Safety measures; Europe; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Government Publications, International; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; 363.19209405
• DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7556
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1831-4732

Abstract

Abstract: The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Norway, and co‐rapporteur Member State, the Netherlands, for the pesticide active substance benfluralin are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of benfluralin as a herbicide on chicory and lettuce and updated following the request from Commission to review the risk assessment as regards birds and mammals and aquatic organisms. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.