The Association of Education Level on Outcome after Distal Radius Fracture. (March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Paksima, Nader; Pahk, Brian; Romo, Santiago; Egol, Kenneth A.
• Is Part Of: Hand. Volume 9:Number 1(2014)
• Page Start: 75
• Page End: 79
• Publication Date: 2014-03
• Subjects: Education -- Socio-economic status -- Distal radius fracture -- Function -- Outcome -- Pain -- Symptomscore; Hand -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Hand -- Surgery; Periodicals; 617.57005
• DOI: 10.1007/s11552-013-9557-y
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1558-9447

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic factors have been found to be predictors of outcome for other ailments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of patient education level on pain and disability after distal radius fracture. Methods: A series of patients with distal radius fractures ( n = 335) were enrolled into a prospective research registry. Standard demographic information was obtained from patients, including a five-value categorical education variable. After treatment with closed reduction, external fixation, or internal fixation patients were evaluated for pain, function (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score [DASH]), range of motion (ROM), and grip strength at standard intervals until 12 months post-injury. A series of linear mixed effects models were developed to evaluate the relationship between time from injury and education level with each of the outcomes measured. Results: Complete demographic and 12-month follow-up data were available on 227 patients (75 %). There were neither group differences in mode of injury, severity, nor treatment modality after stratification by education level. Mixed effects model analyses revealed a significant linear association between level of education and measured outcomes at each follow-up point. Overall, each increase in education level demonstrated a doubling of improvement in pain, ROM, grip strength, and DASH score. Conclusions: Outcome of distal radius fracture depends on acute care and follow-up rehabilitation; however, patient-related factors indicative of socioeconomic status are becoming increasingly relevant as predictors of outcome and should be considered by the orthopaedist.