Do young children track other's beliefs, or merely their perceptual access? An interactive, anticipatory measure of early theory of mind. Issue 10 (5th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barone, Pamela; Wenzel, Lisa; Proft, Marina; Rakoczy, Hannes
• Is Part Of: Royal Society open science. Volume 9:Issue 10(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-10-05
• Subjects: implicit theory of mind -- false belief -- replication -- ignorance -- children; Science -- Periodicals; 500
• DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211278
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2054-5703

Abstract

Abstract : This paper aimed to contribute to answering three questions. First, how robust and reliable are early implicit measures of false belief (FB) understanding? Second, do these measures tap FB understanding rather than simpler processes such as tracking the protagonist's perceptual access? Third, do implicit FB tasks tap an earlier, more basic form of theory of mind (ToM) than standard verbal tasks? We conducted a conceptual replication of Garnham & Perner's task (Garnham and Perner 2001 Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 19, 413–432) simultaneously measuring children's anticipatory looking and interactive behaviours toward an agent with a true or FB ( N = 81, M = 40 months). Additionally, we implemented an ignorance condition and a standard FB task. We successfully replicated the original findings: children's looking and interactive behaviour differed according to the agent's true or FB. However, children mostly did not differentiate between FB and ignorance conditions in various measures of anticipation and uncertainty, suggesting the use of simpler conceptual strategies than full-blown ToM. Moreover, implicit measures were all related to each other but largely not related to performance in the standard FB task, except for first look in the FB condition. Overall, our findings suggest that these implicit measures are robust but may not tap the same underlying cognitive capacity as explicit FB tasks.