Decision flexibilities in autism spectrum disorder: an fMRI study of moral dilemmas. Issue 10 (25th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tei, Shisei; Tanicha, Mizuki; Itahashi, Takashi; Aoki, Yuta Y; Ohta, Haruhisa; Qian, Chenyu; Hashimoto, Ryu-ichiro; Nakamura, Motoaki; Takahashi, Hidehiko; Kato, Nobumasa; Fujino, Junya
• Is Part Of: Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Volume 17:Issue 10(2022)
• Page Start: 904
• Page End: 911
• Publication Date: 2022-03-25
• Subjects: autism spectrum disorder -- flexibility -- functional magnetic resonance imaging -- inferior frontal gyrus -- moral dilemma; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Cognitive neuroscience -- Periodicals; Neuropsychology -- Periodicals; 612.8205
• DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsac023
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1749-5016

Abstract

Abstract: People make flexible decisions across a wide range of contexts to resolve social or moral conflicts. Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) frequently report difficulties in such behaviors, which hinders the flexibility in changing strategies during daily activities or adjustment of perspective during communication. However, the underlying mechanisms of this issue are insufficiently understood. This study aimed to investigate decision flexibility in ASD using a functional magnetic resonance imaging task that involved recognizing and resolving two types of moral dilemmas: cost–benefit analysis (CBA) and mitigating inevitable misconducts (MIM). The CBA session assessed the participants' pitting of result-oriented outcomes against distressful harmful actions, whereas the MIM session assessed their pitting of the extenuation of a criminal sentence against a sympathetic situation of defendants suffering from violence or disease. The behavioral outcome in CBA-related flexibility was significantly lower in the ASD group compared to that of the typical development group. In the corresponding CBA contrast, activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus was lower in the ASD group. Meanwhile, in the MIM-related flexibility, there were no significant group differences in behavioral outcome or brain activity. Our findings add to our understanding of flexible decision-making in ASD.