Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Therapy for Muscular Strength, Hypertrophy, and Endurance in Healthy and Special Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Issue 5 (29th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Perera, Edward; Zhu, Xi Ming; Horner, Nolan S.; Bedi, Asheesh; Ayeni, Olufemi R.; Khan, Moin
• Is Part Of: Clinical journal of sport medicine. Volume 32:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 531
• Page End: 545
• Publication Date: 2022-09-29
• Subjects: Kaatsu -- blood flow restriction -- strength training -- muscle hypertrophy; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; 617.1027
• DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000991
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1050-642X

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training is an increasingly applied tool with potential benefits in muscular hypertrophy, strength, and endurance. This study investigates the effectiveness of BFR training relative to other forms of training on muscle strength, hypertrophy, and endurance. Data sources: We performed systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed and assessed the methodological quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Main results: We included 53 randomized controlled trials with 31 included in meta-analyses. For muscular strength comparing low-intensity BFR (LI-BFR) training with high-intensity resistance training (HIRT), the pooled mean difference (MD) for 1 repetition maximum was 5.34 kg (95% CI, 2.58-8.09; P < 0.01) favoring HIRT. When comparing LI-BFR training with HIRT for torque, the MD was 6.35 N·m (95% CI, 0.5-12.3; P = 0.04) also favoring HIRT. However, comparing LI-BFR with low-intensity resistance training (LIRT) for torque, there was a MD of 9.94 N·m (95% CI, 5.43-14.45; P < 0.01) favoring BFR training. Assessing muscle hypertrophy, the MD in cross-sectional area was 0.96 cm 2 (95% CI, 0.21-1.7; P = 0.01) favoring pooled BFR training compared with nonocclusive training. Assessing endurance, V̇o 2 maximum demonstrated a greater mean increase of 0.37 mL/kg/min (95% CI, −0.97 to 3.17; P = 0.64) in BFR endurance training compared with endurance training alone. Conclusion: Blood flow restriction training produced increases in muscular strength, hypertrophy, and endurance. Comparing LI-BFR training with HIRT, HIRT was a significantly better training modality for increasing muscle hypertrophy and strength. However, LI-BFR was superior when compared with a similar low-intensity protocol. Blood flow restriction training is potentially beneficial to those unable to tolerate the high loads of HIRT; however, better understanding of its risk to benefit ratio is needed before clinical application. Level of evidence: Level 1.