Effects of preoperative personal education on shoulder function and lymphedema in patients with breast cancer: A consort. Issue 38 (23rd September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Byun, Hayoung; Jang, Yunjeong; Kim, Ju-Yeon; Kim, Jae-Myung; Lee, Chang Han
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 101:Issue 38(2022)
• Page Start: e30810
• Publication Date: 2022-09-23
• Subjects: breast cancer -- lymphedema -- shoulder function -- shoulder motion -- shoulder pain; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030810
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Background: To compare the incidence and severity of ipsilateral shoulder dysfunction and lymphedema of 2 groups of patients needing to undergo unilateral breast cancer surgery, one of which had only received printed education materials and the other group which had received educational materials plus preoperative education. Methods: We selected 61 patients who had been diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer and planned to undergo surgery. Before surgery, patients were randomly assigned, either to a control group that only received printed education materials about exercise for shoulder pain relief and lymphatic edema prevention following breast cancer surgery, or to an experimental group that received the printed education material with personal education. Participants were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. To evaluate the impairment of shoulder function, we measured the passive shoulder range of motion (ROM), the degree of pain as visual analog scale (VAS), the short version of the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (short DASH) scores, and the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI). We checked arm circumferences to evaluate lymphedema. Results: There was no significant difference in demographic or clinical variables between the control and experimental groups. The experimental group showed significantly less limitation in abduction ( P = .042) and forward flexion ( P = .039) in the 6 months following surgery. Change in the VAS, short DASH, and SPADI scores were 1.633 ( P < .001), 2.167 ( P < .001), and 4.1 ( P = .003) at 1 month following surgery, respectively. These then decreased with time. These changes started before shoulder ROM and arm circumference changes had occurred, which had started 3 months following surgery. Conclusions: Preoperative education might be helpful for the prevention of a shoulder ROM limitation, and we need to focus on pain and disability in patients immediately following breast cancer surgery, and then on ROM and lymphedema.