Experiences of COVID-19 patients in a Fangcang shelter hospital in China during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative descriptive study. Issue 9 (14th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhong, Yaping; Zhao, Huan; Lee, Tsorng-Yeh; Yu, Tianchi; Liu, Ming Fang; Ji, Ji
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 12:Issue 9(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-09-14
• Subjects: COVID-19 -- INFECTIOUS DISEASES -- QUALITATIVE RESEARCH -- Public health; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065799
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: This study aimed to examine COVID-19 patients' experiences in a Fangcang shelter hospital in China, to provide insights into the effectiveness of this centralised isolation strategy as a novel solution to patient management during emerging infectious disease outbreaks. Design: This study adopted a qualitative descriptive design. Data were collected by individual semistructured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. Setting: This study was undertaken in 1 of the 16 Fangcang shelter hospitals in Wuhan, China between 28 February 2020 and 7 March 2020. Fangcang shelter hospitals were temporary healthcare facilities intended for large-scale centralised isolation, treatment and disease monitoring of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 cases. These hospitals were an essential component of China's response to the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants: A total of 27 COVID-19 patients were recruited by purposive sampling. Eligible participants were (1) COVID-19 patients; (2) above 18 years of age and (3) able to communicate effectively. Exclusion criteria were (1) being clinically or emotionally unstable and (2) experiencing communication difficulties. Results: Three themes and nine subthemes were identified. First, COVID-19 patients experienced a range of psychological reactions during hospitalisation, including fear, uncertainty, helplessness and concerns. Second, there were positive and negative experiences associated with communal living. While COVID-19 patients' evaluation of essential services in the hospital was overall positive, privacy and hygiene issues were highlighted as stressors during their hospital stay. Third, positive peer support and a trusting patient–healthcare professional relationship served as a birthplace for resilience, trust and gratitude in COVID-19 patients. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, while sacrificing privacy, centralised isolation has the potential to mitigate negative psychological impacts of social isolation in COVID-19 patients by promoting meaningful peer connections, companionship and support within the shared living space. To our knowledge, this is the first study bringing patients' perspectives into healthcare service appraisal in emergency shelter hospitals.