Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Rationale and Framework for the Monograph and Overview of Eligible Studies. Issue 56 (13th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy; Daniels, Robert D; Cardis, Elisabeth; Cullings, Harry M; Gilbert, Ethel; Hauptmann, Michael; Kendall, Gerald; Laurier, Dominique; Linet, Martha S; Little, Mark P; Lubin, Jay H; Preston, Dale L; Richardson, David B; Stram, Daniel; Thierry-Chef, Isabelle; Schubauer-Berigan, Mary K
• Is Part Of: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Issue 56(2020)
• Page Start: 97
• Page End: 113
• Publication Date: 2020-07-13
• Subjects: Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Congresses; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1052-6773

Abstract

Abstract: Whether low-dose ionizing radiation can cause cancer is a critical and long-debated question in radiation protection. Since the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation report by the National Academies in 2006, new publications from large, well-powered epidemiological studies of low doses have reported positive dose-response relationships. It has been suggested, however, that biases could explain these findings. We conducted a systematic review of epidemiological studies with mean doses less than 100 mGy published 2006–2017. We required individualized doses and dose-response estimates with confidence intervals. We identified 26 eligible studies (eight environmental, four medical, and 14 occupational), including 91 000 solid cancers and 13 000 leukemias. Mean doses ranged from 0.1 to 82 mGy. The excess relative risk at 100 mGy was positive for 16 of 22 solid cancer studies and 17 of 20 leukemia studies. The aim of this monograph was to systematically review the potential biases in these studies (including dose uncertainty, confounding, and outcome misclassification) and to assess whether the subset of minimally biased studies provides evidence for cancer risks from low-dose radiation. Here, we describe the framework for the systematic bias review and provide an overview of the eligible studies.