The effect of COVID‐19 on general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section. A cross‐sectional analysis of six hospitals in the north‐west of England. (2nd November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bhatia, K.; Columb, M.; Bewlay, A.; Eccles, J.; Hulgur, M.; Jayan, N.; Lie, J.; Verma, D.; Parikh, R.
• Is Part Of: Anaesthesia. Volume 76:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: 312
• Page End: 319
• Publication Date: 2020-11-02
• Subjects: caesarean -- COVID‐19 -- general anaesthesia -- pregnancy -- regional anaesthesia; Anesthesia -- Periodicals; 617.96
• DOI: 10.1111/anae.15313
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-2409

Abstract

Summary: At the onset of the global pandemic of COVID‐19 (SARS‐CoV‐2), guidelines recommended using regional anaesthesia for caesarean section in preference to general anaesthesia. National figures from the UK suggest that 8.75% of over 170, 000 caesarean sections are performed under general anaesthetic. We explored whether general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section changed during the peak of the pandemic across six maternity units in the north‐west of England. We analysed anaesthetic information for 2480 caesarean sections across six maternity units from 1 April to 1 July 2020 (during the pandemic) and compared this information with data from 2555 caesarean sections performed at the same hospitals over a similar period in 2019. Primary outcome was change in general anaesthesia rate for caesarean section. Secondary outcomes included overall caesarean section rates, obstetric indications for caesarean section and regional to general anaesthesia conversion rates. A significant reduction (7.7 to 3.7%, p < 0.0001) in general anaesthetic rates, risk ratio (95%CI) 0.50 (0.39–0.93), was noted across hospitals during the pandemic. Regional to general anaesthesia conversion rates reduced (1.7 to 0.8%, p = 0.012), risk ratio (95%CI) 0.50 (0.29–0.86). Obstetric indications for caesarean sections did not change (p = 0.17) while the overall caesarean section rate increased (28.3 to 29.7%), risk ratio (95%CI) 1.02 (1.00–1.04), p = 0.052. Our analysis shows that general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section declined during the peak of the pandemic. Anaesthetic decision‐making, recommendations from anaesthetic guidelines and presence of an on‐site anaesthetic consultant in the delivery suite seem to be the key factors that influenced this decline.