Prevalence, management and outcomes of unrecognized delirium in a National Sample of 1, 493 older emergency department patients: how many were sent home and what happened to them?. (12th February 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Prevalence, management and outcomes of unrecognized delirium in a National Sample of 1, 493 older emergency department patients: how many were sent home and what happened to them?. (12th February 2022)
- Main Title:
- Prevalence, management and outcomes of unrecognized delirium in a National Sample of 1, 493 older emergency department patients: how many were sent home and what happened to them?
- Authors:
- Lee, Jacques S
Tong, Tiffany
Chignell, Mark
Tierney, Mary C
Goldstein, Judah
Eagles, Debra
Perry, Jeffrey J
McRae, Andrew
Lang, Eddy
Hefferon, Darren
Rose, Louise
Kiss, Alex
Borgundvaag, Bjug
McLeod, Shelley
Melady, Don
Boucher, Valérie
Sirois, Marie-Josée
Émond, Marcel - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Retrospective studies estimate Emergency Department (ED) delirium recognition at <20%; few prospective studies have assessed delirium recognition and outcomes for patients with unrecognized delirium. Objectives: To prospectively measure delirium recognition by ED nurses and physicians, document their confidence in diagnosis and disposition, actual dispositions, and patient outcomes. Methods: Prospective observational study of people ≥65 years. We assessed delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method, then asked ED staff if the patient had delirium, confidence in their assessment, if the patient could be discharged, and contacted patients 1 week postdischarge. We report proportions and 95% confidence intervals (Cls). Results: We enrolled 1, 493 participants; mean age was 77.9 years; 49.2% were female, 79 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.2–6.5%) had delirium. ED nurses missed delirium in 43/78 cases (55.1%, 95% CI 43.4–66.4%). Nurses considered 12/43 (27.9%) patients with unrecognized delirium safe to discharge. Median confidence in their delirium diagnosis for patients with unrecognized delirium was 7.0/10. Physicians missed delirium in 10/20 (50.0%, 95% CI 27.2–72.8) cases and considered 2/10 (20.0%) safe to discharge. Median confidence in their delirium diagnosis for patients with unrecognized delirium was 8.0/10. Fifteen patients with unrecognized delirium were sent home: 6.7% died at 1 week follow-up vs. none in those with recognized delirium and 1.1% in the restAbstract: Background: Retrospective studies estimate Emergency Department (ED) delirium recognition at <20%; few prospective studies have assessed delirium recognition and outcomes for patients with unrecognized delirium. Objectives: To prospectively measure delirium recognition by ED nurses and physicians, document their confidence in diagnosis and disposition, actual dispositions, and patient outcomes. Methods: Prospective observational study of people ≥65 years. We assessed delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method, then asked ED staff if the patient had delirium, confidence in their assessment, if the patient could be discharged, and contacted patients 1 week postdischarge. We report proportions and 95% confidence intervals (Cls). Results: We enrolled 1, 493 participants; mean age was 77.9 years; 49.2% were female, 79 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.2–6.5%) had delirium. ED nurses missed delirium in 43/78 cases (55.1%, 95% CI 43.4–66.4%). Nurses considered 12/43 (27.9%) patients with unrecognized delirium safe to discharge. Median confidence in their delirium diagnosis for patients with unrecognized delirium was 7.0/10. Physicians missed delirium in 10/20 (50.0%, 95% CI 27.2–72.8) cases and considered 2/10 (20.0%) safe to discharge. Median confidence in their delirium diagnosis for patients with unrecognized delirium was 8.0/10. Fifteen patients with unrecognized delirium were sent home: 6.7% died at 1 week follow-up vs. none in those with recognized delirium and 1.1% in the rest of the cohort. Conclusion: Delirium recognition by nurses and physicians was sub-optimal at ~50% and may be associated with increased mortality. Research should explore root causes of unrecognized delirium, and novel strategies to systematically improve delirium recognition and patient outcomes. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Age and ageing. Volume 51:Number 2(2022)
- Journal:
- Age and ageing
- Issue:
- Volume 51:Number 2(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 51, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0051-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-02-12
- Subjects:
- Emergency department -- delirium -- geriatrics -- recognition -- older people
Aging -- Periodicals
Geriatrics -- Periodicals
618.97 - Journal URLs:
- http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ageing/afab214 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0002-0729
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0736.080000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23939.xml