Behavioural variation between piscivore and insectivore rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Issue 3 (30th May 2021) - Monnet, Gauthier
Abstract: A proactive‐reactive continuum integrating multiple ( i.e ., 3+) dimensions of animal behaviour has been reported as a major axis of behavioural differentiation, but its stability along a biological hierarchy from individuals to populations remains speculative. Piscivore and insectivore rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) represent closely related ecotypes with strong ecological divergence driven by selection for a large‐bodied piscivorous lifestyle with fast juvenile growth vs . selection for smaller adult body size and lower growth associated with an insectivorous diet. To evaluate whether differences in behaviour between ecotypes are consistent with a proactive‐reactive axis and consistent along a biological hierarchy, the authors examined variation in emergence time from a shelter, exploration, activity and predator inspection among individuals, populations and ecotypes of juvenile piscivore and insectivore rainbow trout O. mykiss . As expected, the faster‐growing piscivore ecotype was more proactive ( i.e ., shorter emergence time, exploration and predator inspection) than the more reactive insectivore ecotype. This behavioural contrast was partly maintained across populations, although activity differences were most pronounced among populations, rather than emergence time. Insectivore fry showed substantial variation in behavioural expression among individuals within populations; by contrast, piscivores showed highly similar proactive behaviours with significantly lower inter‐individual variation in behavioural expression, suggesting intense selection on behaviour supporting their faster growth. This work suggests that piscivore and insectivore O. mykiss broadly differ in behaviour along a proactive vs . reactive continuum, and highlights the greater multidimensionality of behavioural expression within the insectivore ecotype. Contrasting behaviours between ecotypes may result from differential selection for slow vs . fast juvenile growth and associated metabolism, and may contribute to adult trophic specialization.