Forecasting the publication and citation outcomes of COVID-19 preprints. Issue 9 (28th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gordon, Michael; Bishop, Michael; Chen, Yiling; Dreber, Anna; Goldfedder, Brandon; Holzmeister, Felix; Johannesson, Magnus; Liu, Yang; Tran, Louisa; Twardy, Charles; Wang, Juntao; Pfeiffer, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Royal Society open science. Volume 9:Issue 9(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-09-28
• Subjects: preprinting -- forecasting -- science policy; Science -- Periodicals; 500
• DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220440
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2054-5703

Abstract

Abstract : Many publications on COVID-19 were released on preprint servers such as medRxiv and bioRxiv. It is unknown how reliable these preprints are, and which ones will eventually be published in scientific journals. In this study, we use crowdsourced human forecasts to predict publication outcomes and future citation counts for a sample of 400 preprints with high Altmetric score. Most of these preprints were published within 1 year of upload on a preprint server (70%), with a considerable fraction (45%) appearing in a high-impact journal with a journal impact factor of at least 10. On average, the preprints received 162 citations within the first year. We found that forecasters can predict if preprints will be published after 1 year and if the publishing journal has high impact. Forecasts are also informative with respect to Google Scholar citations within 1 year of upload on a preprint server. For both types of assessment, we found statistically significant positive correlations between forecasts and observed outcomes. While the forecasts can help to provide a preliminary assessment of preprints at a faster pace than traditional peer-review, it remains to be investigated if such an assessment is suited to identify methodological problems in preprints.