An integrated approach to assessing abiotic and biotic threats to post‐fire plant species recovery: Lessons from the 2019–2020 Australian fire season. Issue 10 (6th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gallagher, Rachael V.; Allen, Stuart P.; Mackenzie, Berin D. E.; Keith, David A.; Nolan, Rachael H.; Rumpff, Libby; Gosper, Carl R.; Pegg, Geoffrey; van Leeuwen, Stephen; Ooi, Mark K. J.; Yates, Colin J.; Merow, Cory; Williams, Richard J.; Nikolopoulos, Efthymios I.; Beaumont, Linda J.; Auld, Tony D.
• Other Names: Varner Morgan handlingEditor.
• Is Part Of: Global ecology & biogeography. Volume 31:Issue 10(2022)
• Page Start: 2056
• Page End: 2069
• Publication Date: 2022-03-06
• Subjects: bushfire recovery -- cascading hazards -- conservation planning -- EPBC Act -- extinction risk -- fire response traits -- plant diversity -- threatened species -- threatening processes -- vulnerability assessment; Ecology -- Periodicals; Biogeography -- Periodicals; Biodiversity -- Periodicals; Macroevolution -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/geb.13478
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1466-822X

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Existing abiotic and biotic threats to plant species (e.g., disease, drought, invasive species) affect their capacity to recover post‐fire. We use a new, globally applicable framework to assess the vulnerability of 26, 062 Australian plant species to a suite of active threats after the 2019–2020 fires. Location: Australia. Time period: 2019–2020. Major species studied: Plants. Methods: Spatial data for existing threats and information on species‐level susceptibility were combined with estimates of the extent of range burnt in southern Australia (> 22°S) to assign species against 10 criteria into vulnerability categories ( high, medium, low, none, data deficient ). We explore in detail results for three threats (drought, disease, feral animals), highlighting where impacts from multiple threats ranked high vulnerability may compound to reduce post‐fire recovery. Results: Analysis of the full suite of 10 vulnerability criteria, which encompass a broad range of threats, revealed large numbers of species vulnerable to poor post‐fire recovery from one or more different hazards ( high vulnerability: 1, 243 species; medium vulnerability: 2, 450 species). Collectively, 457 plant species that burnt extensively (> 50%) across their range are highly vulnerable to poor recovery due to exposure to pre‐fire drought conditions (235 species), disease (186 species), or feral animals (97 species). Of these 457 species, 61 are vulnerable to more than one of these three threats, highlighting how a suite of interacting hazards can impact plant recovery after fire. Main conclusions: While fire can renew plant populations by stimulating recruitment and resetting competitive interactions, the presence of existing threats in post‐fire landscapes jeopardizes recovery. The simultaneous impact of multiple threats that impact recovery can create a suite of hazards that contribute to declines and, potentially, extinction. Our method for rapid post‐fire vulnerability assessment can be applied to large numbers of plant species or other biota in fire affected regions globally.