A k‐space‐based method to measure and correct for temporal B0 field variations in MR temperature imaging. Issue 3 (16th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Parker, Dennis L.; Payne, Allison; Odéen, Henrik
• Is Part Of: Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 88:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 1098
• Page End: 1111
• Publication Date: 2022-05-16
• Subjects: MRI field drift monitoring -- PRF temperature phase correction -- respiration monitoring; Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals; Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals; 616.07548
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29275
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0740-3194

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Present a method to use change in phase in repeated Cartesian k‐space measurements to monitor the change in magnetic field for dynamic MR temperature imaging. Methods: The method is applied to focused ultrasound heating experiments in a gelatin phantom and an ex vivo salt pork sample, without and with simulated respiratory motion. Results: In each experiment, phase variations due to B0 field drift and respiration were readily apparent in the measured phase difference. With correction, the SD of the temperature over time was reduced from 0.18°C to 0.14°C (no breathing) and from 0.81°C to 0.22°C (with breathing) for the gelatin phantom, and from 0.68°C to 0.13°C (no breathing) and from 1.06°C to 0.17°C (with breathing) for the pork sample. The accuracy in nonheated regions, assessed as the RMS error deviation from 0°C, improved from 1.70°C to 1.11°C (no breathing) and from 4.73°C to 1.47°C (with breathing) for the gelatin phantom, and from 5.95°C to 0.88°C (no breathing) and from 13.40°C to 1.73°C (with breathing) for the pork sample. The correction did not affect the temperature measurement accuracy in the heated regions. Conclusion: This work demonstrates that phase changes resulting from variations in B0 due to drift and respiration, commonly seen in MR thermometry applications, can be measured directly from 3D Cartesian acquisition methods. The correction of temporal field variations using the presented technique improved temperature accuracy, reduced variability in nonheated regions, and did not reduce accuracy in heated regions. Abstract : Click here for author‐reader discussions