Recommendations for successful sensory screening in older adults with dementia in long-term care: a qualitative environmental scan of Canadian specialists. Issue 1 (26th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wittich, Walter; Höbler, Fiona; Jarry, Jonathan; McGilton, Katherine S
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 8:Issue 1(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-01-26
• Subjects: nursing -- long-term care -- sensory screening -- hearing loss -- vision loss; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019451
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: This study aimed to identify screening tools, technologies and strategies that vision and hearing care specialists recommend to front-line healthcare professionals for the screening of older adults in long-term care homes who have dementia. Setting: An environmental scan of healthcare professionals took place via telephone interviews between December 2015 and March 2016. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, proofed for accuracy, and their contents thematically analysed by two members of the research team. Participants: A convenience sample of 11 professionals from across Canada specialising in the fields of vision and hearing healthcare and technology for older adults with cognitive impairment were included in the study. Outcome measures: As part of a larger mixed-methods project, this qualitative study used semistructured interviews and their subsequent content analysis. Results: Following a two-step content analysis of interview data, coded citations were grouped into three main categories: (1) barriers, (2) facilitators and (3) tools and strategies that do or do not work for sensory screening of older adults with dementia. We report on the information offered by participants within each of these themes, along with a summary of tools and strategies that work for screening older adults with dementia. Conclusions: Recommendations from sensory specialists to nurses working in long-term care included the need for improved interprofessional communication and collaboration, as well as flexibility, additional time and strategic use of clinical intuition and ingenuity. These suggestions at times contradicted the realities of service provision or the need for standardised and validated measures.