Practices and attitudes about delayed umbilical cord clamping for term infants: a descriptive survey among midwives. (18th August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Practices and attitudes about delayed umbilical cord clamping for term infants: a descriptive survey among midwives. (18th August 2022)
- Main Title:
- Practices and attitudes about delayed umbilical cord clamping for term infants: a descriptive survey among midwives
- Authors:
- Rousseau, Anne
Duron, Marie-Amélie
Letouzey, Mathilde - Abstract:
- Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess variations in midwives' practices of cord clamping (early versus delayed) and to identify factors potentially associated with delayed clamping. This was a descriptive cross-sectional survey by self-administered online questionnaire among French midwives working in delivery rooms from March to July 2018. We obtained complete responses from 350 midwives. Only 120 (34.3%) reported always or sometimes performing delayed cord clamping at one minute or more after birth. Delayed cord clamping was significantly associated with midwives' experience (adjusted OR 3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10, 7.83 for experience >10 years), maternity unit written protocol (adjusted OR (aOR) 5.17; 95% CI 1.88, 16.00), knowledge of guidelines (aOR 3.33; 95% CI 1.98, 5.71) and neonatal care level 1 (aOR 2.95; 95% CI 1.53, 5.78). Impact Statement: What is already know on this subject? Despite benefits and the safety of delayed cord clamping, many newborns likely had their umbilical cords clamped immediately after delivery as part of routine care or because providers were not convinced of the benefits of delayed clamping. What do the results of this study add? Most of the midwives surveyed did not systematically delay cord clamping. Individual and organisational factors were associated with adherence to guidelines regarding delayed cord clamping. What are the implications of these findings for clinical and/or further research? A protocol should beAbstract: The aim of this study was to assess variations in midwives' practices of cord clamping (early versus delayed) and to identify factors potentially associated with delayed clamping. This was a descriptive cross-sectional survey by self-administered online questionnaire among French midwives working in delivery rooms from March to July 2018. We obtained complete responses from 350 midwives. Only 120 (34.3%) reported always or sometimes performing delayed cord clamping at one minute or more after birth. Delayed cord clamping was significantly associated with midwives' experience (adjusted OR 3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10, 7.83 for experience >10 years), maternity unit written protocol (adjusted OR (aOR) 5.17; 95% CI 1.88, 16.00), knowledge of guidelines (aOR 3.33; 95% CI 1.98, 5.71) and neonatal care level 1 (aOR 2.95; 95% CI 1.53, 5.78). Impact Statement: What is already know on this subject? Despite benefits and the safety of delayed cord clamping, many newborns likely had their umbilical cords clamped immediately after delivery as part of routine care or because providers were not convinced of the benefits of delayed clamping. What do the results of this study add? Most of the midwives surveyed did not systematically delay cord clamping. Individual and organisational factors were associated with adherence to guidelines regarding delayed cord clamping. What are the implications of these findings for clinical and/or further research? A protocol should be implemented in every maternity unit with information about the benefits and risks of delayed cord clamping to reduce variations in practice and improve the safety of care. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. Volume 42:Number 6(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
- Issue:
- Volume 42:Number 6(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 42, Issue 6 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0042-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 1751
- Page End:
- 1758
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08-18
- Subjects:
- Delayed cord clamping -- midwife practice -- survey study
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/journal/jog ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/01443615.asp ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/01443615.2022.2036964 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0144-3615
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5025.400000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23884.xml