Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab and omalizumab) for severe allergic asthma: A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines ‐ recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma. Issue 5 (18th May 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab and omalizumab) for severe allergic asthma: A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines ‐ recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma. Issue 5 (18th May 2020)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab and omalizumab) for severe allergic asthma: A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines ‐ recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma
- Authors:
- Agache, Ioana
Rocha, Claudio
Beltran, Jessica
Song, Yang
Posso, Margarita
Solà, Ivan
Alonso‐Coello, Pablo
Akdis, Cezmi
Akdis, Mubeccel
Canonica, Giorgio W.
Casale, Thomas
Chivato, Tomas
Corren, Jonathan
Del Giacco, Stefano
Eiwegger, Thomas
Firinu, Davide
Gern, James E.
Hamelmann, Eckard
Hanania, Nicola
Mäkelä, Mika
Martín, Irene Hernández
Nair, Parameswaran
O'Mahony, Liam
Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G.
Papi, Alberto
Park, Hae‐Sim
Pérez de Llano, Luis
Quirce, Santiago
Sastre, Joaquin
Shamji, Mohamed
Schwarze, Jurgen
Canelo‐Aybar, Carlos
Palomares, Oscar
Jutel, Marek
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Allergic asthma is a frequent asthma phenotype. Both IgE and type 2 cytokines are increased, with some degree of overlap with other phenotypes. Systematic reviews assessed the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, dupilumab and omalizumab (alphabetical order) vs standard of care for patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs and health economic evaluations, published in English. Critical and important asthma‐related outcomes were evaluated. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. All three biologicals reduced with high certainty the annualized asthma exacerbation rate: benralizumab incidence rate ratios (IRR) 0.63 (95% CI 0.50 − 0.81); dupilumab IRR 0.58 (95%CI 0.47 − 0.73); and omalizumab IRR 0.56 (95%CI 0.42 − 0.73). Benralizumab and dupilumab improved asthma control with high certainty and omalizumab with moderate certainty; however, none reached the minimal important difference (MID). Both benralizumab and omalizumab improved QoL with high certainty, but only omalizumab reached the MID. Omalizumab enabled ICS dose reduction with high certainty. Benralizumab and omalizumab showed an increase in drug‐related adverse events (AEs) with low to moderate certainty. All three biologicals had moderate certainty for an ICER/QALY value above the willingness to pay threshold. There was high certainty that in children 6‐12 years old omalizumab decreased theAbstract: Allergic asthma is a frequent asthma phenotype. Both IgE and type 2 cytokines are increased, with some degree of overlap with other phenotypes. Systematic reviews assessed the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, dupilumab and omalizumab (alphabetical order) vs standard of care for patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs and health economic evaluations, published in English. Critical and important asthma‐related outcomes were evaluated. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. All three biologicals reduced with high certainty the annualized asthma exacerbation rate: benralizumab incidence rate ratios (IRR) 0.63 (95% CI 0.50 − 0.81); dupilumab IRR 0.58 (95%CI 0.47 − 0.73); and omalizumab IRR 0.56 (95%CI 0.42 − 0.73). Benralizumab and dupilumab improved asthma control with high certainty and omalizumab with moderate certainty; however, none reached the minimal important difference (MID). Both benralizumab and omalizumab improved QoL with high certainty, but only omalizumab reached the MID. Omalizumab enabled ICS dose reduction with high certainty. Benralizumab and omalizumab showed an increase in drug‐related adverse events (AEs) with low to moderate certainty. All three biologicals had moderate certainty for an ICER/QALY value above the willingness to pay threshold. There was high certainty that in children 6‐12 years old omalizumab decreased the annualized exacerbation rate [IRR 0.57 (95%CI 0.45‐0.72)], improved QoL [relative risk 1.43 (95%CI 1.12 −1.83)], reduced ICS [mean difference (MD) −0.45 (95% CI −0.58 to −0.32)] and rescue medication use [ MD −0.41 (95%CI −0.66 to −0.15)]. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Allergy. Volume 75:Issue 5(2020)
- Journal:
- Allergy
- Issue:
- Volume 75:Issue 5(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 75, Issue 5 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 75
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0075-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 1043
- Page End:
- 1057
- Publication Date:
- 2020-05-18
- Subjects:
- benralizumab -- dupilumab -- exacerbations -- omalizumab -- severe allergic asthma
Allergy -- Periodicals
616.97 - Journal URLs:
- http://estar.bl.uk/cgi-bin/sciserv.pl?collection=journals&journal=01054538 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1398-9995 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/all.14235 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0105-4538
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0790.945000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23875.xml