Comprehensive cross‐platform comparison of methods for non‐invasive EGFR mutation testing: results of the RING observational trial. Issue 1 (13th November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comprehensive cross‐platform comparison of methods for non‐invasive EGFR mutation testing: results of the RING observational trial. Issue 1 (13th November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comprehensive cross‐platform comparison of methods for non‐invasive EGFR mutation testing: results of the RING observational trial
- Authors:
- Romero, Atocha
Jantus‐Lewintre, Eloisa
García‐Peláez, Beatriz
Royuela, Ana
Insa, Amelia
Cruz, Patricia
Collazo, Ana
Pérez Altozano, Javier
Vidal, Oscar Juan
Diz, Pilar
Cobo, Manuel
Hernández, Berta
Vázquez Estevez, Sergio
Benítez, Gretel
Guirado, Maria
Majem, Margarita
Bernabé, Reyes
Ortega, Ana Laura
Blasco, Ana
Bosch‐Barrera, Joaquim
Jurado, Jose M.
García González, Jorge
Viteri, Santiago
Garcia Giron, Carlos
Massutí, Bartomeu
Lopez Martín, Ana
Rodriguez‐Festa, Alejandro
Calabuig‐Fariñas, Silvia
Molina‐Vila, Miguel Ángel
Provencio, Mariano - Abstract:
- Abstract : Several platforms for noninvasive EGFR testing are currently used in the clinical setting with sensitivities ranging from 30% to 100%. Prospective studies evaluating agreement and sources for discordant results remain lacking. Herein, seven methodologies including two next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based methods, three high‐sensitivity PCR‐based platforms, and two FDA‐approved methods were compared using 72 plasma samples, from EGFR ‐mutant non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients progressing on a first‐line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). NGS platforms as well as high‐sensitivity PCR‐based methodologies showed excellent agreement for EGFR‐sensitizing mutations ( K = 0.80–0.89) and substantial agreement for T790M testing ( K = 0.77 and 0.68, respectively). Mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) obtained by different quantitative methods showed an excellent reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.86–0.98). Among other technical factors, discordant calls mostly occurred at mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) ≤ 0.5%. Agreement significantly improved when discarding samples with MAF ≤ 0.5%. EGFR mutations were detected at significantly lower MAFs in patients with brain metastases, suggesting that these patients risk for a false‐positive result. Our results support the use of liquid biopsies for noninvasive EGFR testing and highlight the need to systematically report MAFs. Abstract : Plasma samples from 72 EGFR ‐mutant advanced NSCLC patients, collectedAbstract : Several platforms for noninvasive EGFR testing are currently used in the clinical setting with sensitivities ranging from 30% to 100%. Prospective studies evaluating agreement and sources for discordant results remain lacking. Herein, seven methodologies including two next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based methods, three high‐sensitivity PCR‐based platforms, and two FDA‐approved methods were compared using 72 plasma samples, from EGFR ‐mutant non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients progressing on a first‐line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). NGS platforms as well as high‐sensitivity PCR‐based methodologies showed excellent agreement for EGFR‐sensitizing mutations ( K = 0.80–0.89) and substantial agreement for T790M testing ( K = 0.77 and 0.68, respectively). Mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) obtained by different quantitative methods showed an excellent reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.86–0.98). Among other technical factors, discordant calls mostly occurred at mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) ≤ 0.5%. Agreement significantly improved when discarding samples with MAF ≤ 0.5%. EGFR mutations were detected at significantly lower MAFs in patients with brain metastases, suggesting that these patients risk for a false‐positive result. Our results support the use of liquid biopsies for noninvasive EGFR testing and highlight the need to systematically report MAFs. Abstract : Plasma samples from 72 EGFR ‐mutant advanced NSCLC patients, collected upon progression to first‐line TKI, were analyzed by seven methodologies (two NGS‐based methods, three high‐sensitivity PCR‐based platforms, and two FDA‐approved methods). Our study demonstrates a good to excellent agreement between methodologies and supports the use of liquid biopsies for therapy decision‐making. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Molecular oncology. Volume 15:Issue 1(2021)
- Journal:
- Molecular oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 15:Issue 1(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 15, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0015-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 43
- Page End:
- 56
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11-13
- Subjects:
- circulating free DNA -- epidermal growth factor receptor -- NGS -- non‐small‐cell lung cancer -- osimertinib -- tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Cancer -- Molecular aspects -- Periodicals
616.994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.journals.elsevier.com/molecular-oncology/ ↗
http://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1878-0261/issues/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/1878-0261.12832 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1574-7891
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5900.817993
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23865.xml