An ecological study of objective rest–activity markers of lithium response in bipolar-I-disorder. Issue 12 (13th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Scott, Jan; Hennion, Vincent; Meyrel, Manon; Bellivier, Frank; Etain, Bruno
• Is Part Of: Psychological medicine. Volume 52:Issue 12(2022)
• Page Start: 2281
• Page End: 2289
• Publication Date: 2020-11-13
• Subjects: Actigraphy -- bipolar disorders -- clinical cohort -- lithium -- response; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Medicine and psychology -- Periodicals; Clinical psychology -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720004171
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0033-2917

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Despite its pivotal role in prophylaxis for bipolar-I-disorders (BD-I), variability in lithium (Li) response is poorly understood and only a third of patients show a good outcome. Converging research strands indicate that rest–activity rhythms can help characterize BD-I and might differentiate good responders (GR) and non-responders (NR). Methods: Seventy outpatients with BD-I receiving Li prophylaxis were categorized as GR or NR according to the ratings on the retrospective assessment of response to lithium scale (Alda scale). Participants undertook 21 consecutive days of actigraphy monitoring of sleep quantity (SQ), sleep variability (SV) and circadian rhythmicity (CR). Results: Twenty-five individuals were categorized as GR (36%). After correcting statistical analysis to minimize false discoveries, four variables (intra-daily variability; median activity level; amplitude; and relative amplitude of activity) significantly differentiated GR from NR. The odds of being classified as a GR case were greatest for individuals showing more regular/stable CR (1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08, 2.05; p < 0.04). Also, there was a trend for lower SV to be associated with GR (odds ratio: 0.56; 95% CI 0.31, 1.01; p < 0.06). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest actigraphy study of rest–activity rhythms and Li response. Circadian markers associated with fragmentation, variability, amount and/or amplitude of day and night-time activity best-identified GR. However, associations were modest and future research must determine whether these objectively measured parameters, singly or together, represent robust treatment response biomarkers. Actigraphy may offer an adjunct to multi-platform approaches aimed at developing personalized treatments or stratification of individuals with BD-I into treatment-relevant subgroups.