Development of a risk assessment model to differentiate malignant and benign musculoskeletal soft‐tissue masses on magnetic resonance imaging. Issue 1 (2nd December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Obaid, Haron; Vassos, Nicholas; Adams, Scott J; Bryce, Rhonda; Donuru, Achala; Sinclair, Nicolette
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. Volume 64:Issue 1(2020:Feb.)
• Page Start: 9
• Page End: 17
• Publication Date: 2019-12-02
• Subjects: biopsy -- magnetic resonance imaging -- risk assessment -- sarcoma -- soft‐tissue neoplasm; Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- Australasia -- Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12981
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1754-9477

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: This study aimed to develop a risk stratification model to differentiate benign and malignant MRI‐imaged musculoskeletal soft‐tissue tumours, informing decisions surrounding biopsy and follow‐up imaging. Methods: Imaging of patients who underwent MRI and subsequent biopsy to evaluate a soft‐tissue mass was retrospectively reviewed. Features analysed included patient age; tumour size; shape; margins; enhancement pattern; signal intensity pattern; deep fascia, neurovascular bundle, bone and joint involvement; and the presence of necrosis, haemorrhage, oedema and intralesional fat. Univariate comparisons, by final histopathological status, employed t ‐tests and chi‐square tests, followed by simple and multiple logistic regressions. Variables included in the final multiple regression model were used to define a three‐level risk stratification strategy. Results: One‐hundred and ten patients were included in the analysis. Univariate relationships were identified between malignancy and age, tumour size, deep fascia involvement, neurovascular involvement, necrosis, haemorrhage, oedema and heterogeneous enhancement (all P < 0.01). Final multiple regression modelling included size, enhancement and oedema. Thirty of 40 (75%) tumours >5 cm with surrounding oedema ('high risk') were malignant, 13 of 47 (28%) tumours with one or more of tumour size >5 cm, surrounding oedema or heterogeneous enhancement ('moderate risk') were malignant, and none of the 16 tumours ≤5 cm with the absence of surrounding oedema and heterogeneous enhancement ('low risk') were malignant. Conclusions: A model including tumour size, enhancement and oedema has potential to stratify soft‐tissue tumours into high‐, intermediate‐ and low‐risk categories; this may inform decisions surrounding biopsy and follow‐up imaging.