Influence of Landscape Characteristics on Hunter Space Use and Success. Issue 7 (29th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rowland, Mary M.; Nielson, Ryan M.; Wisdom, Michael J.; Johnson, Bruce K.; Findholt, Scott; Clark, Darren; Didonato, Guy T.; Hafer, Jennifer M.; Naylor, Bridgett J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of wildlife management. Volume 85:Issue 7(2021)
• Page Start: 1394
• Page End: 1409
• Publication Date: 2021-07-29
• Subjects: archery hunt -- Cervus canadensis -- elk -- hunter success -- motorized access -- mule deer -- Odocoileus hemionus -- rifle hunt -- space use -- utilization distribution; Wildlife management -- Periodicals; Zoology -- Periodicals; 333.954
• DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22107
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-541X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Sport hunting of ungulates is a predominant recreational pursuit and the primary tool for managing their populations in North America and beyond, given its influence on ungulate distributions, social organization, and population performance. Similarly, land management, such as motorized vehicle access, influences ungulate distributions during and outside hunting seasons. Although research on ungulate responses to hunting and land use is widespread, knowledge gaps persist about space use of hunters and what landscape features discriminate among hunt types and between successful and unsuccessful hunters. We used telemetry location data from hunters ( n = 341) to estimate space use from 2008–2013 during 3 types of controlled, 5‐day hunts for antlered mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) and elk ( Cervus canadensis ) in northeastern Oregon, USA: archery elk, rifle deer, and rifle elk. To evaluate space use, we developed utilization distributions for each hunter, created core areas (50% contours) for groups of hunters, and derived several metrics of space‐use overlap between successful and unsuccessful hunters. We also modeled predictors of space use using resource utilization functions with beta regression and stepwise model building. Hunter space use was compressed, with even the largest core area (unsuccessful rifle elk hunters) encompassing <16% (1, 178 ha) of the area. We found strong similarities in space use of rifle hunters compared to archers, and core areas of successful hunters were markedly smaller than those of unsuccessful hunters (e.g., x ̅ = 104 ha vs. 681 ha, respectively, for archers). Percentage cover and distance from open roads were the most consistent covariates in the 6 final models (successful vs. unsuccessful for each of 3 hunts) but with different signs. For example, predicted use of archery and rifle elk hunters increased with cover but decreased for rifle deer hunters. Although the same covariates were in the final models for unsuccessful and successful rifle elk hunters, their negligible spatial overlap suggested they sought those features in different locales, a pattern also documented for rifle deer hunters. Our models performed well (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients = 0.99 for 5 of 6 models), reflecting their utility for managing hunters and landscapes. Our results suggest that strategic management of open roads and forest cover can benefit managers seeking to balance hunter opportunity and satisfaction with harvest objectives, especially for species of special concern such as mule deer, and that differences in space use among hunter groups should be accounted for in hunting season designs. © 2021 The Wildlife Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. : We evaluated space use of successful and unsuccessful elk and mule deer hunters, contrasting archers with rifle hunters, and found minimal spatial overlap between groups but similarities in environmental features influencing space use. Integrated management of forest cover in tandem with roads and trails can aid in providing hunter opportunity while maintaining herd numbers and composition at desired levels.