Technical Note: 4D cone‐beam CT reconstruction from sparse‐view CBCT data for daily motion assessment in pencil beam scanned proton therapy (PBS‐PT). Issue 12 (24th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: den Otter, Lydia A.; Chen, Kuanling; Janssens, Guillaume; Meijers, Arturs; Both, Stefan; Langendijk, Johannes A.; Rosen, Lane R.; Wu, Hsinshun T.; Knopf, Antje‐Christin
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 47:Issue 12(2020)
• Page Start: 6381
• Page End: 6387
• Publication Date: 2020-10-24
• Subjects: 4D‐CBCT -- image reconstruction -- inter‐fractional motion -- Lung cancer -- pencil beam scanning -- proton therapy; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/mp.14521
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The number of pencil beam scanned proton therapy (PBS‐PT) facilities equipped with cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging treating thoracic indications is constantly rising. To enable daily internal motion monitoring during PBS‐PT treatments of thoracic tumors, we assess the performance of M otion‐A ware R ecO nstructiO n method using S patial and Te mporal R egularization (MA‐ROOSTER) four‐dimensional CBCT (4DCBCT) reconstruction for sparse‐view CBCT data and a realistic data set of patients treated with proton therapy. Methods: Daily CBCT projection data for nine non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and one SCLC patient were acquired at a proton gantry system (IBA Proteus® One). Four‐dimensional CBCT images were reconstructed applying the MA‐ROOSTER and the conventional phase‐correlated Feldkamp‐Davis‐Kress (PC‐FDK) method. Image quality was assessed by visual inspection, contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), and the structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Furthermore, gross tumor volume (GTV) centroid motion amplitudes were evaluated. Results: Image quality for the 4DCBCT reconstructions using MA‐ROOSTER was superior to the PC‐FDK reconstructions and close to FDK images (median CNR: 1.23 [PC‐FDK], 1.98 [MA‐ROOSTER], and 1.98 [FDK]; median SNR: 2.56 [PC‐FDK], 4.76 [MA‐ROOSTER], and 5.02 [FDK]; median SSIM: 0.18 [PC‐FDK vs FDK], 0.31 [MA‐ROOSTER vs FDK]). The improved image quality of MA‐ROOSTER facilitated GTV contour warping and realistic motion monitoring for most of the reconstructions. Conclusion: MA‐ROOSTER based 4DCBCTs performed well in terms of image quality and appear to be promising for daily internal motion monitoring in PBS‐PT treatments of (N)SCLC patients.