Cardiovascular drugs and COVID‐19 clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Issue 8 (25th April 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cardiovascular drugs and COVID‐19 clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Issue 8 (25th April 2022)
- Main Title:
- Cardiovascular drugs and COVID‐19 clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Authors:
- Asiimwe, Innocent G.
Pushpakom, Sudeep P.
Turner, Richard M.
Kolamunnage‐Dona, Ruwanthi
Jorgensen, Andrea L.
Pirmohamed, Munir - Abstract:
- Abstract : Aims: To update our previously reported systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies on cardiovascular drug exposure and COVID‐19 clinical outcomes by focusing on newly published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: More than 500 databases were searched between 1 November 2020 and 2 October 2021 to identify RCTs that were published after our baseline review. One reviewer extracted data with other reviewers verifying the extracted data for accuracy and completeness. Results: After screening 22 414 records, we included 24 and 21 RCTs in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses, respectively. The most investigated drug classes were angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs) and anticoagulants, investigated by 10 and 11 studies respectively. In meta‐analyses, ACEI/ARBs did not affect hospitalization length (mean difference −0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.83; 0.98 d, n = 1183), COVID‐19 severity (risk ratio/RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.71; 1.15, n = 1661) or mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.58; 1.47, n = 1646). Therapeutic anticoagulation also had no effect (hospitalization length mean difference −0.29, 95% CI −1.13 to 0.56 d, n = 1449; severity RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.70; 1.04, n = 2696; and, mortality RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77; 1.13, n = 5689). Other investigated drug classes were antiplatelets (aspirin, 2 trials), antithrombotics (sulodexide, 1 trial), calcium channel blockers (amlodipine, 1 trial)Abstract : Aims: To update our previously reported systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies on cardiovascular drug exposure and COVID‐19 clinical outcomes by focusing on newly published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: More than 500 databases were searched between 1 November 2020 and 2 October 2021 to identify RCTs that were published after our baseline review. One reviewer extracted data with other reviewers verifying the extracted data for accuracy and completeness. Results: After screening 22 414 records, we included 24 and 21 RCTs in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses, respectively. The most investigated drug classes were angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs) and anticoagulants, investigated by 10 and 11 studies respectively. In meta‐analyses, ACEI/ARBs did not affect hospitalization length (mean difference −0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.83; 0.98 d, n = 1183), COVID‐19 severity (risk ratio/RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.71; 1.15, n = 1661) or mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.58; 1.47, n = 1646). Therapeutic anticoagulation also had no effect (hospitalization length mean difference −0.29, 95% CI −1.13 to 0.56 d, n = 1449; severity RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.70; 1.04, n = 2696; and, mortality RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77; 1.13, n = 5689). Other investigated drug classes were antiplatelets (aspirin, 2 trials), antithrombotics (sulodexide, 1 trial), calcium channel blockers (amlodipine, 1 trial) and lipid‐modifying drugs (atorvastatin, 1 trial). Conclusion: Moderate‐ to high‐certainty RCT evidence suggests that cardiovascular drugs such as ACEIs/ARBs are not associated with poor COVID‐19 outcomes, and should therefore not be discontinued. These cardiovascular drugs should also not be initiated to treat or prevent COVID‐19 unless they are needed for an underlying currently approved therapeutic indication. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of clinical pharmacology. Volume 88:Issue 8(2022)
- Journal:
- British journal of clinical pharmacology
- Issue:
- Volume 88:Issue 8(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 88, Issue 8 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 88
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0088-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 3577
- Page End:
- 3599
- Publication Date:
- 2022-04-25
- Subjects:
- cardiovascular drugs -- COVID‐19 -- living systematic review -- meta‐analysis -- RCTs
Pharmacology -- Periodicals
Drugs -- Periodicals
615.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2125 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/bcp.15331 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0306-5251
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2307.180000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23853.xml