"High-precision, reconstructed 3D model" of skull scanned by conebeam CT: Reproducibility verified using CAD/CAM data. (January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Katsumura, Seiko; Sato, Keita; Ikawa, Tomoko; Yamamura, Keiko; Ando, Eriko; Shigeta, Yuko; Ogawa, Takumi
• Is Part Of: Legal medicine. Volume 18(2016)
• Page Start: 37
• Page End: 43
• Publication Date: 2016-01
• Subjects: Conebeam CT -- Helical CT -- High-precision -- Reconstructed 3D model -- Identification -- Metal artifact -- Dental treatment; Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals; Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine légale -- Périodiques; Medical jurisprudence; Periodicals; 614.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.11.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1344-6223

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: We evaluated reproducibility of the three-dimensional reconstruction model from CT. Conebeam CT possesses reproducibility near the original more than helical CT. "High-precision, reconstructed 3D model" resolves metal artifacts due to prosthesis. We expect utilization to personal identification using advantage convenience of CT. Abstract: Computed tomography (CT) scanning has recently been introduced into forensic medicine and dentistry. However, the presence of metal restorations in the dentition can adversely affect the quality of three-dimensional reconstruction from CT scans. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of a "high-precision, reconstructed 3D model" obtained from a conebeam CT scan of dentition, a method that might be particularly helpful in forensic medicine. We took conebeam CT and helical CT images of three dry skulls marked with 47 measuring points; reconstructed three-dimensional images; and measured the distances between the points in the 3D images with a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) marker. We found that in comparison with the helical CT, conebeam CT is capable of reproducing measurements closer to those obtained from the actual samples. In conclusion, our study indicated that the image-reproduction from a conebeam CT scan was more accurate than that from a helical CT scan. Furthermore, the "high-precision reconstructed 3D model" facilitates reliable visualization of full-sized oral and maxillofacial regions in both helical and conebeam CT scans.