A comparison of machine and deep-learning algorithms applied to multisource data for a subtropical forest area classification. Issue 5 (3rd March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sothe, C.; De Almeida, C. M.; Schimalski, M. B.; Liesenberg, V.; La Rosa, L. E. C.; Castro, J. D. B.; Feitosa, R. Q.
• Is Part Of: International journal of remote sensing. Volume 41:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 1943
• Page End: 1969
• Publication Date: 2020-03-03
• Subjects: Remote sensing -- Periodicals; Télédétection -- Périodiques; 621.3678
• DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1681600
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-1161

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This work explores the integration of airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data and WorldView-2 (WV2) images to classify the land cover of a subtropical forest area in Southern Brazil. Different deep and machine learning methods were used: one based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and three ensemble methods. We adopted both pixel- (in the case of CNN) and object-based approaches. The results demonstrated that the integration of LiDAR and WV2 data led to a significant increase (7% to 16%) in accuracies for all classifiers, with kappa coefficient ( κ ) ranging from 0.74 for the random forest (RF) classifier associated with the WV2 dataset, to 0.92 for the forest by penalizing attributes (FPA) with the full (LiDAR + WV2) dataset. Using the WV2 dataset solely, the best κ was 0.81 with CNN classifier, while for the LiDAR dataset, the best κ was 0.8 with the rotation forest (RotF) algorithm. The use of LiDAR data was especially useful for the discrimination of vegetation classes because of the different height properties among them. In its turn, the WV2 data provided better performance for classes with less structure variation, such as field and bare soil. All the classification algorithms had a nearly similar performance: the results vary slightly according to the dataset used and none of the methods achieved the best accuracy for all classes. It was noticed that both datasets (WV2 and LiDAR) even when applied alone achieved good results with deep and machine learning methods. However, the advantages of integrating active and passive sensors were evident. All these methods provided promising results for land cover classification experiments of the study area in this work.