Does sex impact outcomes after mitral valve surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. (December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: EL-Andari, Ryaan; Bozso, Sabin J.; Fialka, Nicholas M.; Kang, Jimmy J.H.; Nagendran, Jeevan
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of surgery. Volume 111:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 99
• Page End: 109
• Publication Date: 2022-12
• Subjects: Mitral valve -- mitral valve repair -- mitral valve replacement -- sex differences -- systematic review -- meta-analysis; Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1177/14574969221124468
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1457-4969

Abstract

Background and objective: The published literature investigating the impact of sex on outcomes after mitral valve (MV) surgery has demonstrated inferior outcomes for females over males. However, the true relationship between sex and outcomes after MV surgery continues to be poorly understood. Materials: PubMed, Medline, and Embase were systematically searched for articles published from 1 January 2005 to 1 August 2021. This systematic review included retrospective and prospective studies investigating the relationship between sex and outcomes after MV surgery. In all, 2068 articles were initially screened and 12 studies were included in this review. Results: Few studies were adequately powered or structured to investigate this topic. Few studies propensity matched patients or isolated for surgical approach. In individual studies, females experienced increased rates of short-term and long-term mortality and increased 1-year mortality in the pooled data. Males experienced increased rates of required pacemaker insertion. The remaining rates of morbidity and mortality did not differ significantly between males and females. Conclusions: This review identified increased rates of 1-year mortality in the pooled data for females, while males had increased rates of pacemaker insertion. Despite this, the absence of propensity matching and isolating for surgical approach has introduced confounding variables that impair the ability of the included studies to interpret the results found in the current literature. Studies isolating for surgical approach, propensity matching patients, and examining outcomes with long-term follow-up are required to elucidate the true nature of this relationship.