Drug-eluting balloons in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Issue 3 (March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Drug-eluting balloons in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Issue 3 (March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Drug-eluting balloons in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
- Authors:
- Besic, Kristina Maric
Strozzi, Maja
Margetic, Eduard
Bulum, Josko
Kolaric, Branko - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: We compared efficacy of bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting balloon (DEB) combination vs BMS alone, in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina (UA) were randomized to BMS only or BMS + DEB group. Angiographic follow-up was performed after 6 months. The primary endpoints were binary in-stent restenosis (ISR) and late lumen loss (LLL) and the secondary endpoints were target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis (ST), and new acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Results: A total of 85 patients were enrolled, 44 (BMS) and 41 (BMS + DEB). The median age was 67 (36–84) years and 68 (80%) were male. Fifty-two patients (61.2%) had NSTEMI and 33 patients (38.8%) UA. There was no difference in patient demographics, risk factors, and clinical characteristics, except for more smokers in the BMS + DEB group 18/41 (43.9%) vs 9/44 (20.5%). At follow-up, no significant difference in binary ISR was found; p = 0.593, but LLL was significantly lower in the BMS + DEB group 0.68 (0.00–2.15) mm vs 0.22 (0.00–2.35) mm; p = 0.002. The difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate combining TLR, ST, and ACS, between the groups was also non-significant, 29.5% (BMS) vs 24.4% (BMS + DEB); p = 0.835. One patient had a subacute ST (BMS + DEB) due to clopidogrel resistance. Conclusion: Patients treatedAbstract: Background: We compared efficacy of bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting balloon (DEB) combination vs BMS alone, in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina (UA) were randomized to BMS only or BMS + DEB group. Angiographic follow-up was performed after 6 months. The primary endpoints were binary in-stent restenosis (ISR) and late lumen loss (LLL) and the secondary endpoints were target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis (ST), and new acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Results: A total of 85 patients were enrolled, 44 (BMS) and 41 (BMS + DEB). The median age was 67 (36–84) years and 68 (80%) were male. Fifty-two patients (61.2%) had NSTEMI and 33 patients (38.8%) UA. There was no difference in patient demographics, risk factors, and clinical characteristics, except for more smokers in the BMS + DEB group 18/41 (43.9%) vs 9/44 (20.5%). At follow-up, no significant difference in binary ISR was found; p = 0.593, but LLL was significantly lower in the BMS + DEB group 0.68 (0.00–2.15) mm vs 0.22 (0.00–2.35) mm; p = 0.002. The difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate combining TLR, ST, and ACS, between the groups was also non-significant, 29.5% (BMS) vs 24.4% (BMS + DEB); p = 0.835. One patient had a subacute ST (BMS + DEB) due to clopidogrel resistance. Conclusion: Patients treated with BMS + DEB combination for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome had significantly less LLL in comparison to patients treated with BMS alone but without an impact on patient clinical outcomes. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cardiology. Volume 65:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Journal of cardiology
- Issue:
- Volume 65:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 65, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 65
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0065-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 203
- Page End:
- 207
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03
- Subjects:
- Acute coronary syndrome -- Drug-eluting balloons -- Bare-metal stents -- Late lumen loss
Cardiology -- Periodicals
616.12 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09145087 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09145087 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.05.007 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0914-5087
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.864200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23800.xml