New geographic model of care to manage the post-COVID-19 elective surgery aftershock in England: a retrospective observational study. Issue 10 (31st October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Clarke, Jonathan; Murray, Alice; Markar, Sheraz Rehan; Barahona, Mauricio; Kinross, James
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 10:Issue 10(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10-31
• Subjects: surgery -- health policy -- organisation of health services -- public health; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042392
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The suspension of elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented and has resulted in record volumes of patients waiting for operations. Novel approaches that maximise capacity and efficiency of surgical care are urgently required. This study applies Markov multiscale community detection (MMCD), an unsupervised graph-based clustering framework, to identify new surgical care models based on pooled waiting-lists delivered across an expanded network of surgical providers. Design: Retrospective observational study using Hospital Episode Statistics. Setting: Public and private hospitals providing surgical care to National Health Service (NHS) patients in England. Participants: All adult patients resident in England undergoing NHS-funded planned surgical procedures between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2018. Main outcome measures: The identification of the most common planned surgical procedures in England (high-volume procedures (HVP)) and proportion of low, medium and high-risk patients undergoing each HVP. The mapping of hospitals providing surgical care onto optimised groupings based on patient usage data. Results: A total of 7 811 891 planned operations were identified in 4 284 925 adults during the 1-year period of our study. The 28 most common surgical procedures accounted for a combined 3 907 474 operations (50.0% of the total). 2 412 613 (61.7%) of these most common procedures involved 'low risk' patients. Patients travelled an average of 11.3 km for these procedures. Based on the data, MMCD partitioned England into 45, 16 and 7 mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive natural surgical communities of increasing coarseness. The coarser partitions into 16 and seven surgical communities were shown to be associated with balanced supply and demand for surgical care within communities. Conclusions: Pooled waiting-lists for low-risk elective procedures and patients across integrated, expanded natural surgical community networks have the potential to increase efficiency by innovatively flexing existing supply to better match demand.