Heat‐Generating Nuclear Waste in Salt: Field Testing and Simulation. Issue 1 (1st February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johnson, Peter J.; Otto, Shawn; Weaver, Douglas J.; Dozier, Brian; Miller, Terry A.; Jordan, Amy B.; Hayes-Rich, Nathan G.; Stauffer, Philip H.
• Is Part Of: Vadose zone journal. Volume 18:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 14
• Publication Date: 2019-02-01
• Subjects: Soil science -- Periodicals; Zone of aeration -- Periodicals; Groundwater flow -- Periodicals; Groundwater flow; Zone of aeration; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 631.4
• DOI: 10.2136/vzj2018.08.0160
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1539-1663

Abstract

Abstract : Core Ideas: A field‐scale experiment and numerical simulations confirm salt backfill behavior. Simulations closely match temperature around and under the piled salt backfill. Results indicate limited dissolution–precipitation reactions around the heat source. Alteration of backfill is unlikely if the drift is allowed to dry before emplacement. Investigations relating to in‐drift disposal of heat‐generating nuclear waste in salt have raised questions about heat–brine interactions in the unsaturated run‐of‐mine (RoM) salt pile used as backfill. These interactions have the potential to change the structure of the RoM salt surrounding the canister, possibly altering long‐term containment of the source. An experiment is in progress at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), New Mexico, in which a heated canister was placed on the floor of an open drift, covered in a pile of RoM salt, and energized with 1000 W. Temperature in the RoM salt pile had stabilized after about 15 d, allowing evaluation of the heat‐up period of the ongoing experiment. Using a multiphase porous flow simulator that has been modified to handle salt‐specific coupled processes, we examined coupled thermal–hydrological–chemical behavior in the RoM salt pile. Our simulations suggest that for the relatively dry cases examined, porosity changes within RoM salt in a generic salt repository are likely to be minor in the period between waste emplacement and plastic closure of the drift. The primary sensitivity for porosity change is to the early moisture content of the RoM salt used to cover the canister. Secondary influences include moisture availability from the disturbed rock zone (DRZ) surrounding the drift and the capillary pressure ratio between the DRZ and the RoM salt. Early changes in porosity and permeability may be affected by moisture content, but this was not observed in the test. Such changes would be most likely to occur when using damp RoM salt or if waste is emplaced in a drift immediately following opening of the drift before evaporative dewatering of the drift walls occurs.