Diagnosis value of SARS‐CoV‐2 antigen/antibody combined testing using rapid diagnostic tests at hospital admission. Issue 5 (15th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Veyrenche, Nicolas; Bolloré, Karine; Pisoni, Amandine; Bedin, Anne‐Sophie; Mondain, Anne‐Marie; Ducos, Jacques; Segondy, Michel; Montes, Brigitte; Pastor, Patrick; Morquin, David; Makinson, Alain; Le Moing, Vincent; Van de Perre, Philippe; Foulongne, Vincent; Tuaillon, Edouard
• Other Names: Luo Guangxiang (George) guestEditor.; Ly Hinh guestEditor.; Gao Shou‐Jiang guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical virology. Volume 93:Issue 5(2021)
• Page Start: 3069
• Page End: 3076
• Publication Date: 2021-02-15
• Subjects: coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) -- diagnosis -- rapid diagnostic tests -- SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody -- SARS‐CoV‐2 antigen; Virology -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26855
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0146-6615

Abstract

Abstract: The implementation of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may enhance the efficiency of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) testing, as RDTs are widely accessible and easy to use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a diagnosis strategy based on a combination of antigen and immunoglobulin M (IgM) or immunoglobulin G (IgG) serological RDTs. Plasma and nasopharyngeal samples were collected between 14 March and 11 April 2020 at hospital admission from 45 patients with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) confirmed COVID‐19 and 20 negative controls. SARS‐CoV‐2 antigen (Ag) was assessed in nasopharyngeal swabs using the Coris Respi‐Strip. For IgM/IgG detection, SureScreen Diagnostics and Szybio Biotech RDTs were used in addition to laboratory assays (Abbott Alinity i SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG and Theradiag COVID‐19 IgM enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay). Using the Ag RDT, 13 out of 45 (29.0%) specimens tested positive, the sensitivity was 87.0% for cycle threshold ( C t ) values ≤25% and 0% for C t values greater than 25. IgG detection was associated with high C t values and the amount of time after the onset of symptoms. The profile of isolated IgM on RDTs was more frequently observed during the first and second week after the onset of symptoms. The combination of Ag and IgM/IgG RDTs enabled the detection of up to 84.0% of COVID‐19 confirmed cases at hospital admission. Antigen and antibody‐based RDTs showed suboptimal performances when used alone. However when used in combination, they are able to identify most COVID‐19 patients admitted in an emergency department. Highlights: ‐ Antigen and antibody‐based RDTs showed suboptimal performances when used alone. ‐ The Ag RDT showed good sensitivity on samples with CT values below 25. ‐ IgM/IgG RDTs showed good sensitivity as of the second week after onset of symptoms. ‐ The combination of Ag and IgM/IgG RDTs identified most patients with COVID‐19. ‐ RDTs may have a significant place in the global response to the COVID‐19 pandemic.