Assessment of surgical capacity in Chiapas, Mexico: a cross-sectional study of the public and private sector. Issue 7 (26th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Roa, Lina; Moeller, Ellie; Fowler, Zachary; Carrillo, Fernando; Mohar, Sebastian; Williams, Wendy; Meara, John; Riviello, Robert; Uribe-Leitz, Tarsicio; Macias, Valeria
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 11:Issue 7(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-07-26
• Subjects: health policy -- surgery -- anaesthetics; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044160
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Surgical, anaesthesia and obstetric (SAO) care are essential, life-saving components of universal healthcare. In Chiapas, Mexico's southernmost state, the capacity of SAO care is unknown. This study aims to assess the surgical capacity in Chiapas, Mexico, as it relates to access, infrastructure, service delivery, surgical volume, quality, workforce and financial risk protection. Methods: A cross-sectional study of Ministry of Health public hospitals and private hospitals in Chiapas was performed. The translated Surgical Assessment Tool (SAT) was implemented in sampled hospitals. Surgical volume was collected retrospectively from hospital logbooks. Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare public and private hospitals. Catastrophic expenditure from surgical care was calculated. Results: Data were collected from 17 public hospitals and 20 private hospitals in Chiapas. Private hospitals were smaller than public hospitals and public hospitals performed more surgeries per operating room. Not all hospitals reported consistent electricity, running water or oxygen, but private hospitals were more likely to have these basic infrastructure components compared with public hospitals (84% vs 95%; 60% vs 100%; 94.1% vs 100%, respectively). Bellwether surgical procedures performed in private hospitals cost significantly more, and posed a higher risk of catastrophic expenditure, than those performed in public hospitals. Conclusion: Capacity limitations are greater in public hospitals compared with private hospitals. However, the cost of care in the private sector is significantly higher than the public sector and may result in catastrophic expenditures. Targeted interventions to improve the infrastructure, workforce availability and data collection are needed.