Diagnostic per-lesion performance of a simulated gadoxetate disodium-enhanced abbreviated MRI protocol for hepatocellular carcinoma screening. Issue 5 (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tillman, B.G.; Gorman, J.D.; Hru, J.M.; Lee, M.H.; King, M.C.; Sirlin, C.B.; Marks, R.M.
• Is Part Of: Clinical radiology. Volume 73:Issue 5(2018)
• Page Start: 485
• Page End: 493
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; Medical radiology; Radiotherapy; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-9260

Abstract

Abstract : Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic per-lesion performance of a simulated gadoxetate disodium-enhanced abbreviated MRI (AMRI) in cirrhotic and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. Materials and methods: Seventy-nine consecutive patients at risk for HCC due to cirrhosis and/or CHB were included in this retrospective study. For each patient, the first gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI between 2008 through 2014 was analysed. Two independent readers read an anonymised abbreviated image set comprising axial T1-weighted (W) images with fat saturation in the hepatobiliary phase, 20 minutes or more after gadoxetate injection, and axial T2W single-shot fast spin echo images. Each observation >10 mm was scored as negative or suspicious for HCC. Inter-reader agreement was assessed. A composite reference standard was used to determine the per-lesion diagnostic performance for each reader. Results: Inter-reader agreement was substantial (κ = 0.75). The final reference standard showed 27 HCCs in 13 patients (median 21 mm, range 11–100 mm). The two readers each correctly scored 23 as suspicious for HCC (sensitivity = 85.2%), scored a total of 27 and 32 observations as suspicious for HCC (positive predictive value [PPV] = 85.2% and 71.9%), and scored 83 and 78 observations or complete examinations as negative for HCC (negative predictive value [NPV] = 95.2% and 94.9%). Conclusions: The AMRI protocol provides higher per-lesion sensitivity and NPV than reported values for ultrasound, the current recommended technique for screening, and similar per-lesion sensitivity and PPV to reported values for complete dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Highlights: Diagnostic per-lesion performance of a HCC screening abbreviated MRI is proposed. The methods rely on retrospectively simulated abbreviated MRI on patients at risk. The protocol provides higher per-lesion sensitivity than reported for ultrasound. The protocol provides similar per-lesion sensitivity compared to conventional MRI. Implementation could reduce cost and decrease examination time.