A novel method to inverse the water retention curves with consideration of volume change during centrifuge testing. Issue 2 (10th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lai, Yanyin; Garg, Ankit; Chang, Kai; Xing, Xuguang; Fan, Junliang; Liang, Jiaping; Yu, Miao
• Is Part Of: Soil Science Society of America Journal. Volume 85:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 207
• Page End: 216
• Publication Date: 2021-03-10
• Subjects: Soils -- United States -- Periodicals; Soil science -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 631.4973
• DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20183
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0361-5995

Abstract

Abstract: Measuring the soil water retention curve (SWRC) using the centrifuge method often results in compressibility and an increase in bulk density. The compressibility and bulk density of the specimen are always assumed to be constant while deducing the SWRC from centrifuge testing, which may cause inaccurate SWRCs. This study proposed an improved genetic algorithm (GA) to inverse the hydraulic parameters and further constructed the SWRC by taking bulk density into account for soils with varying grain size compositions. For this study, sandy loam soils (i.e., seven treatments T1–T7) were prepared based on different volume ratios of coarse (0.075–2 mm) to fine (<0.075 mm) particles. SWRCs including compressibility and bulk density changes were measured using the centrifuge method. For verification, SWRCs were also independently deduced from one‐dimensional infiltration experiments by inverse analysis using the improved GA that combined multi‐objective optimization and elitist strategy. Upon the final shrinkage ratio of 18.32 to ∼ 26.38%, the bulk density during centrifugation increased by 22.33 to ∼ 35.72% correspondingly, thereby causing a difference in soil moisture of 9.58 to ∼ 16.53% between the corrected and uncorrected SWRCs. The comparison between simulated SWRC and two types of measured SWRCs (i.e., corrected and uncorrected SWRC) demonstrated that the corrected SWRC was more reasonable regardless of soil particle compositions. The findings suggest the corrected SWRC considering bulk density changes provides more accurate hydraulic parameters, which can be inversed from the infiltration data using the improved GA. Core Ideas: Bulk density is adopted for the SWRC correction. Corrected SWRC is more accurate than uncorrected SWRC when using centrifuge method. An improved GA is proposed for inversing parameters based on the infiltration data. Effects of clay, silt, and sand on soil shrinkage are quantified.