Challenging procedures used in systematic reviews by promoting a case‐based approach to the analysis of qualitative methods in nursing trials. Issue 2 (17th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Creamer, Elizabeth G.; Guetterman, Timothy C.; Govia, Ishtar; Fetters, Michael D.
• Is Part Of: Nursing inquiry. Volume 28:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-12-17
• Subjects: intervention -- mixed methods -- nursing research -- qualitative methods -- qualitative mixed method designs -- randomized controlled trials -- systematic review; Nursing -- Periodicals; 610.73
• DOI: 10.1111/nin.12393
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1320-7881

Abstract

Abstract: This methodological discussion invites critical reflection about the procedures used to analyze the contribution of qualitative and mixed methods research to nursing trials by mounting an argument that these should rest on multiple publications produced about a project, rather than a single article. We illustrate the value‐added of this approach with findings from a qualitative, cross‐case analysis of three critical case exemplars from nursing researchers that each used a qualitative approach with a mixed method phase. The holistic lens afforded by a case‐based approach informs nursing inquiry by documenting that the critical case exemplars presented evidence of (a) a sustained commitment of resources and expertise for the qualitative methods that extended across more than one phase of the trial, (b) the impact of the qualitative methods on the trial or its aftermath, (c) deploying a theoretical or conceptual framework for a variety of purposes, and (d) integrating qualitative and quantitative data for purposes of extending explanatory power. Findings challenge the practice of linking purposes served by qualitative and mixed methods to a single trial phase.