S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts. (18th December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts. (18th December 2018)
- Main Title:
- S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
- Authors:
- Cohen, Judah
Coumou, Dim
Hwang, Jessica
Mackey, Lester
Orenstein, Paulo
Totz, Sonja
Tziperman, Eli - Abstract:
- Abstract : The discipline of seasonal climate prediction began as an exercise in simple statistical techniques. However, today the large government forecast centers almost exclusively rely on complex fully coupled dynamical forecast systems for their subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictions while statistical techniques are mostly neglected and those techniques still in use have not been updated in decades. In this Opinion Article, we argue that new statistical techniques mostly developed outside the field of climate science, collectively referred to as machine learning, can be adopted by climate forecasters to increase the accuracy of S2S predictions. We present an example of where unsupervised learning demonstrates higher accuracy in a seasonal prediction than the state‐of‐the‐art dynamical systems. We also summarize some relevant machine learning methods that are most applicable to climate prediction. Finally, we show by comparing real‐time dynamical model forecasts with observations from winter 2017/2018 that dynamical model forecasts are almost entirely insensitive to polar vortex (PV) variability and the impact on sensible weather. Instead, statistical forecasts more accurately predicted the resultant sensible weather from a mid‐winter PV disruption than the dynamical forecasts. The important implication from the poor dynamical forecasts is that if Arctic change influences mid‐latitude weather through PV variability, then the ability of dynamical models to demonstrateAbstract : The discipline of seasonal climate prediction began as an exercise in simple statistical techniques. However, today the large government forecast centers almost exclusively rely on complex fully coupled dynamical forecast systems for their subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictions while statistical techniques are mostly neglected and those techniques still in use have not been updated in decades. In this Opinion Article, we argue that new statistical techniques mostly developed outside the field of climate science, collectively referred to as machine learning, can be adopted by climate forecasters to increase the accuracy of S2S predictions. We present an example of where unsupervised learning demonstrates higher accuracy in a seasonal prediction than the state‐of‐the‐art dynamical systems. We also summarize some relevant machine learning methods that are most applicable to climate prediction. Finally, we show by comparing real‐time dynamical model forecasts with observations from winter 2017/2018 that dynamical model forecasts are almost entirely insensitive to polar vortex (PV) variability and the impact on sensible weather. Instead, statistical forecasts more accurately predicted the resultant sensible weather from a mid‐winter PV disruption than the dynamical forecasts. The important implication from the poor dynamical forecasts is that if Arctic change influences mid‐latitude weather through PV variability, then the ability of dynamical models to demonstrate the existence of such a pathway is compromised. We conclude by suggesting that S2S prediction will be most beneficial to the public by incorporating mixed or a hybrid of dynamical forecasts and updated statistical techniques such as machine learning. This article is categorized under: Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models Abstract : We argue that statistical techniques should be used more broadly in climate prediction, leading to improved accuracy and guide model development. Prior to winter 2017/2018, a statistical model correctly predicted cold across the continents of the Northern Hemisphere and amplified warmth in the Arctic, which was mostly missing in the dynamical model forecasts. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Volume 10:Number 2(2019)
- Journal:
- Wiley interdisciplinary reviews
- Issue:
- Volume 10:Number 2(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 10, Issue 2 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 10
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0010-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12-18
- Subjects:
- climate prediction -- machine learning -- polar vortex -- unsupervised learning
Climatic changes -- Periodicals
Climatic changes
Periodicals
363.7387405 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1757-7799 ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123201100/home ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/wcc.567 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1757-7780
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9317.862400
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23764.xml