Retention of Alzheimer Disease Research Participants. (October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Retention of Alzheimer Disease Research Participants. (October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Retention of Alzheimer Disease Research Participants
- Authors:
- Grill, Joshua D.
Kwon, Jimmy
Teylan, Merilee A.
Pierce, Aimee
Vidoni, Eric D.
Burns, Jeffrey M.
Lindauer, Allison
Quinn, Joseph
Kaye, Jeff
Gillen, Daniel L.
Nan, Bin - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Participant retention is important to maintaining statistical power, minimizing bias, and preventing scientific error in Alzheimer disease and related dementias research. Methods: We surveyed representative investigators from NIH-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRC), querying their use of retention tactics across 12 strategies. We compared survey results to data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center for each center. We used a generalized estimating equation with independent working covariance model and empirical standard errors to assess relationships between survey results and rates of retention, controlling for participant characteristics. Results: Twenty-five (83%) responding ADRCs employed an average 42 (SD=7) retention tactics. In a multivariable model that accounted for participant characteristics, the number of retention tactics used by a center was associated with participant retention (odds ratio=1.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.42, 1.98; P <0.001 for the middle compared with the lowest tertile survey scores; odds ratio=1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.30, 1.94; P <0.001 for the highest compared with the lowest tertile survey scores) at the first follow-up visit. Participant characteristics such as normal cognition diagnosis, older age, higher education, and Caucasian race were also associated with higher retention. Conclusions: Retention in clinical research is more likely to be achieved by employing a variety ofAbstract : Introduction: Participant retention is important to maintaining statistical power, minimizing bias, and preventing scientific error in Alzheimer disease and related dementias research. Methods: We surveyed representative investigators from NIH-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRC), querying their use of retention tactics across 12 strategies. We compared survey results to data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center for each center. We used a generalized estimating equation with independent working covariance model and empirical standard errors to assess relationships between survey results and rates of retention, controlling for participant characteristics. Results: Twenty-five (83%) responding ADRCs employed an average 42 (SD=7) retention tactics. In a multivariable model that accounted for participant characteristics, the number of retention tactics used by a center was associated with participant retention (odds ratio=1.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.42, 1.98; P <0.001 for the middle compared with the lowest tertile survey scores; odds ratio=1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.30, 1.94; P <0.001 for the highest compared with the lowest tertile survey scores) at the first follow-up visit. Participant characteristics such as normal cognition diagnosis, older age, higher education, and Caucasian race were also associated with higher retention. Conclusions: Retention in clinical research is more likely to be achieved by employing a variety of tactics. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. Volume 33:Number 4(2019)
- Journal:
- Alzheimer disease and associated disorders
- Issue:
- Volume 33:Number 4(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0033-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10
- Subjects:
- missing -- missingness -- dropout -- retention -- attrition
Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals
Dementia -- Periodicals
616.8305 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/alzheimerjournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000353 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0893-0341
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0806.255300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23756.xml