Application of UV-LEDs for antibiotic resistance genes inactivation – Efficiency monitoring with qPCR and transformation. Issue 3 (June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Umar, Muhammad; Anglès d'Auriac, Marc; Wennberg, Aina Charlotte
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental chemical engineering. Volume 9:Issue 3(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-06
• Subjects: Antibiotics resistance genes -- ARG inactivation -- UV radiation -- Light emitting diodes -- qPCR -- Transformation; Chemical engineering -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Environmental engineering -- Periodicals; Chemical engineering -- Environmental aspects; Environmental engineering; Periodicals; 660.0286
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105260
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2213-2929

Abstract

Abstract: A dose-response study on a plasmid vector containing ampicillin and kanamycin resistance genes was performed with UVC-LEDs at two different wavelengths (265 and 285 nm) using different UV fluences including 40 mJ/cm 2 and 186 cm 2, typically associated with 4-log inactivation of bacterial pathogens and viruses, respectively. DNA damage was assessed using qPCR and transformation assays: four different qPCR protocols targeting the resistance genes were designed to produce amplicons varying in lengths from 80 to 601 bp to quantify DNA damage. UV irradiation emitted at 265 nm was more efficient than 285 nm, as shown by the transformation and qPCR assays. The inactivation rate coefficients showed that the longer segments damaged faster compared with shorter ones for both 265 and 285 nm UV wavelengths. For the largest qPCR amplicon, UV fluence of 186 mJ/cm 2 using 285 nm wavelength led to a ~4.2-log quantification reduction whereas the corresponding reduction using 265 nm was ~6.5-log. Transformation assays confirmed these findings with 265 nm wavelength requiring lower UV fluence (100 mJ/cm 2 ) than with 285 nm (186 mJ/cm 2 ) to reach the no detection threshold for plasmid transformation and gene expression. Comparing rates of DNA damage were observed for these two methods; approximately 24 mJ/cm 2 was required for the loss of 1-log10 of transformation efficiency using 285 nm. For qPCR, UV fluences required for the loss of 1-log10 amplification were higher and inversely proportional to the amplicon length for both 265 and 285 nm. Graphical Abstract: ga1 Highlights: UV radiation using UV-LEDs effectively damaged antibiotic resistance genes. 265-nm was more efficient than 285-nm as shown by transformation and qPCR assays. No detection threshold for plasmid transformation was achieved for both wavelengths. Fluence for the loss of amplification was inversely proportional to amplicon length. qPCR underestimated the loss of plasmid transformability.