Effect of interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information on intentions and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Issue 1 (23rd January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Usher-Smith, Juliet A; Silarova, Barbora; Sharp, Stephen J; Mills, Katie; Griffin, Simon J
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 8:Issue 1(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-01-23
• Subjects: oncology -- preventive medicine -- public health; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017717
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of the impact on intention to change health-related behaviours and health-related behaviours themselves, including screening uptake, of interventions incorporating information about cancer risk targeted at the general adult population. Design: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis. Data sources: An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2017. Inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trials of interventions including provision of a personal estimate of future cancer risk based on two or more non-genetic variables to adults recruited from the general population that include at least one behavioural outcome. Results: We included 19 studies reporting 12 outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes between studies. There is evidence that interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information do not affect intention to attend or attendance at screening (relative risk 1.00 (0.97–1.03)). There is limited evidence that they increase smoking abstinence, sun protection, adult skin self-examination and breast examination, and decrease intention to tan. However, they do not increase smoking cessation, parental child skin examination or intention to protect skin. No studies assessed changes in diet, alcohol consumption or physical activity. Conclusions: Interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information do not affect uptake of screening, but there is limited evidence of effect on some health-related behaviours. Further research, ideally including objective measures of behaviour, is needed before cancer risk information is incorporated into routine practice for health promotion in the general population.