Quantification of mitral regurgitation after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: Comparison of echocardiography and patient-specific in silico models. (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Caballero, Andrés; Qin, Tongran; Hahn, Rebecca T.; McKay, Raymond; Sun, Wei
• Is Part Of: Computers in biology and medicine. Volume 148(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: Mitral regurgitation -- Doppler echocardiography -- MitraClip -- Percutaneous mitral valve repair -- PISA -- VCA; Medicine -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Biology -- Data processing -- Periodicals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105855
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0010-4825

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Doppler echocardiographic (echo) assessment of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is challenging and often subjective. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of standardized quantitative echo methods for assessment of MR severity after MitraClip repair by comparing measurements against a reference MR severity obtained from patient-specific in silico models. Methods: Post-procedure hemodynamics were simulated under five different MitraClip configurations in previously validated patient-specific in silico models for the treatment of functional MR. The residual regurgitant volume was calculated as in clinical practice using four quantitative virtual echo methods: pulsed Doppler, volumetric, proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) and vena contracta area (VCA). Multiple permutations were performed for each method. Virtual echo MR results were evaluated against reference MR values directly extracted from the 5 patient-specific in silico models. Results: The echo methods with the greatest accuracy were the three-dimensional (3D) volumetric method (r = 0.957, bias −0.8 ± 1.2 ml, p = 0.01), the 3D VCA method wherein velocity time integrals were evaluated for each jet assessed (r = 0.919, bias −1.5 ± 1.7 ml, p = 0.03), and the 3D PISA method integrating surface areas throughout systole (r = 0.98, bias −2.0 ± 0.9 ml, p = 0.003). The pulsed Doppler and 2D volumetric methods had technical limitations that may result in a high underestimation or overestimation of the MR severity after TEER. In the case of multiple regurgitant jets, a more accurate MR assessment was obtained when all significant jets were evaluated. Conclusions: Clinically, the 3D volumetric, 3D VCA and 3D PISA methods gave the most accurate MR quantification after TEER. Three-dimensional echo technologies harbor the potential of becoming the non-invasive imaging tool of choice for MR quantification after complex transcatheter mitral interventions. Highlights: Standardized quantitative echocardiographic methods were evaluated for assessment of residual MR after TEER. The 3D volumetric, 3D VCA and 3D PISA methods showed excellent agreement with the reference MR severity with a bias ≤10%. 3D echo may become the noninvasive imaging tool of choice for MR quantification after transcatheter mitral interventions.