Audit of PSA requesting practices in primary care compared to guidelines established by the Prostate Cancer Risk Management programme in the Avon region of the South West of England. (January 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hultin, S; Hotston, M; Day, A; Taylor, A; Goodall, R; Thomas, P; Bahl, A; Persad, R; Gjini, A
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical urology. Volume 7:Number 1(2014:Jan.)
• Page Start: 45
• Page End: 54
• Publication Date: 2014-01
• Subjects: Prostate cancer -- primary care -- urology -- cancer screening -- general practice -- public health; Genitourinary organs -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Genitourinary organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Urology -- Periodicals; 616.6005
• DOI: 10.1177/2051415813485945
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2051-4158

Abstract

Background: There is considerable challenge in transmitting the complicated information contained in the Prostate Cancer Risk Management (PCRM) programme in the primary care setting.1 The practices surrounding requesting of PSA should be clearly understood by both GP and patient before requesting this investigation, and in order to further understand the needs and requirements of primary care practitioners in this regard we undertook an audit comparing practices in the Avon region of the Southwest of England compared to the guidelines of the PCRM programme.1 Methods: Our study identified a consistent year-on-year increase in PSA requests over the study period across all age categories and regions of the southwest of England. Results: Questionnaire review of practices surrounding the PCRM programme revealed overall good practice but with space for improvement surrounding advice regarding the limitations of prostate biopsy and the relevance of testing in the elderly. Conclusions: Despite requesting practices generally conforming to NICE guidelines, nearly half of all abnormal primary-care PSA tests are repeated. Requests in some cases may fall short of best practice.