Comparison and validation of International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer in a Taiwanese cohort. Issue 8 (18th August 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison and validation of International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer in a Taiwanese cohort. Issue 8 (18th August 2014)
- Main Title:
- Comparison and validation of International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer in a Taiwanese cohort
- Authors:
- Chang, Ming-Chu
Liang, Po-Chin
Jan, I-Shiow
Yang, Ching-Yao
Tien, Yu-Wen
Wei, Shu-Chen
Wong, Jau-Min
Chang, Yu-Ting - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: The International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) designed to diagnosis autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been proposed recently. The diagnostic performance of ICDC has not been previously evaluated in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP, respectively, in comparison with the revised HISORt and Asian criteria in Taiwan. Design: Prospective, consecutive patient cohort. Setting: Largest tertiary referred centre hospital managing pancreatic disease in Taiwan. Participants: 188 patients with AIP and 130 with tissue proofed pancreatic adenocarcinoma were consecutively recruited. Interventions: The ICDC, as well as revised HISORt and Asian criteria, was applied for each participant. Each diagnostic criterion of ICDC was validated with special reference to levels 1 and 2 in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP. Outcomes: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Each diagnostic criterion of ICDC was validated with special reference to levels 1 and 2 in AIP and focal-type AIP. Results: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC for all AIP were the best: 89.4%, 100% and 93.7%, respectively, in these three criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC for focal-type AIP (84.9%, 100% and 93.8%) were also the best among these three criteria. The area under the curve of receiver-operator characteristic of ICDC was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97) in all AIP and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) in focal-type AIP. Conclusions: The sensitivity, specificity andAbstract : Objectives: The International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) designed to diagnosis autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been proposed recently. The diagnostic performance of ICDC has not been previously evaluated in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP, respectively, in comparison with the revised HISORt and Asian criteria in Taiwan. Design: Prospective, consecutive patient cohort. Setting: Largest tertiary referred centre hospital managing pancreatic disease in Taiwan. Participants: 188 patients with AIP and 130 with tissue proofed pancreatic adenocarcinoma were consecutively recruited. Interventions: The ICDC, as well as revised HISORt and Asian criteria, was applied for each participant. Each diagnostic criterion of ICDC was validated with special reference to levels 1 and 2 in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP. Outcomes: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Each diagnostic criterion of ICDC was validated with special reference to levels 1 and 2 in AIP and focal-type AIP. Results: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC for all AIP were the best: 89.4%, 100% and 93.7%, respectively, in these three criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC for focal-type AIP (84.9%, 100% and 93.8%) were also the best among these three criteria. The area under the curve of receiver-operator characteristic of ICDC was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97) in all AIP and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) in focal-type AIP. Conclusions: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC are higher than the revised HISORt and Asian criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each criterion are higher in diffuse-type AIP compared with focal-type AIP. Under the same specificity, the sensitivity and accuracy of ICDC are higher than other diagnostic criteria in focal-type AIP. ICDC has better diagnostic performance compared with previously proposed diagnostic criteria in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 4:Issue 8(2014)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 4:Issue 8(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 8 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0004-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2014-08-18
- Subjects:
- ancreatic disease < GASTROENTEROLOGY -- GASTROENTEROLOGY
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005900 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23700.xml